1585
submitted 11 months ago by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 174 points 11 months ago

A communist nation that can really provide all that is as realistic as capitalistic utopia.

[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 104 points 11 months ago

Not a tankie, but the USSR had mostly solved this problem, despite all its other issues. There did exist some homelessness, but nowhere near the extent of current USA.

[-] pelya@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago

Sure, you could get a piece of land in Siberian tundra at any time, I would not call that housing.

Moving to a city was way more complicated than in capitalist US. You could not simply buy an apartment. You had to be allocated an apartment by the government. And you needed connections for that. Or bribes. Ideally both. If you think your local rabid Republicans do not care for little wage slave men, you never experienced USSR, it was like that but 100x worse.

[-] Mercival@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Well, I'm from a post-USSR country and a substantial part of this was the criminalization of homelessness. Can't have homeless people, if you lock them up (be it in a prison or asylum).

Then again, just about anyone, who did not conform to the party's message got locked up. Getting your place bugged at the slightest hint you might be up to something disagreeable and all that good stuff. The secret police could disappear and or beat you up without any real justification.

I hate late-stage capitalism as much as you, but coming from a country that's been through this, I am extremely reluctant to give the rotten and frankly repugnant USSR regime any credit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 24 points 11 months ago

The real communist solution to homelessness was to put them in jails. True story.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 36 points 11 months ago
[-] probablyaCat@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago

Woohoo both systems suck. You can actually believe that just because one system is bad, what is considered the opposite is also bad. Marx was not some omniscient doctor manhattan. He had some ideas. Some were good critiques on capitalist culture. Others were fantasy that do not function in the real world.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 21 points 11 months ago

Notice how the folks arguing in favor of Communism have sources and receipts, while the folks arguing against it have done nothing but regurgitated Capitalist propaganda. Also note folks who are opposed to Communism and Marx's philosophy are always forced to admit that it only works on paper, because his logic is irrefutable if you address it with a modicum of intellectual honesty...

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago

It's funny how upset it makes people when you point out the elephant in the room.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago
[-] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

No one is going to deny that making perpetual motion device is good. How are you going to do that?

Do you have source and receipts for real life communism solving housing problem? Not being better than capitalism. Solving. Being better than capitalism is kinda low bar you know. There are plenty of other things that real life capitalism does better than real life communism, hence communism failure. No one is going to show up with receipts and sources because obvious.

You show us tents as a capitalist solution. That's not a capitalist solution. That's the problem itself. You're misleading.

because his logic is irrefutable if you address it with a modicum of intellectual honesty...

Can you at least try to sound less douche about things?

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago

The joke is that Capitalism DOES NOT have a solution to homelessness because there is zero profit motive to solve it. And facts dont care about your feelngs, you cant refute Marx's philosophy while being intellectual honest. Capitalist Economists study Das Kapital because Marx was so fucking spot on.

[-] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Yes, that's why there is no pure capitalist country anywhere.

you cant refute Marx's philosophy while being intellectual honest.

Why are you keep doing this? I said I don't disagree with Marx. It'd be nice if communism can happen. Facts don't care about your feelings either and all the shitty attemps of communism failed due to human being shitty. If you have to kill off people to keep the ideology, only to fail after about few decades, it has some reality problems.

And again, I cannot stress this enough, can you please stop sounding like a 16 year old kid who just read few paragraphs of Marx going iamverysmart about it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

No need to refute Marx, reality has already proven time and time again that communism doesn't work in practice.

Btw your argument only applies to "pure" capitalism, without any government interference. Homelessness is not really an issue in many European countries.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

You mean the reality where every 1st world nation on the planet did everything in their power to keep Communism from working. Bahahaha

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Didn't take much to stop a system dreamed up by idealists and idiots from working. The very concept is flawed.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] onion@feddit.de 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

In what communist country was housing a problem?

[-] SloganLessons@kbin.social 74 points 11 months ago

This is a trick question, the real answer is that there weren’t real communist countries

[-] Guildo@feddit.de 10 points 11 months ago
[-] DeLift@feddit.nl 4 points 11 months ago
[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 8 points 11 months ago

It's the final refuge for tankies. That and the old "social democracy only works by exploiting the global south" canard.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

“social democracy only works by exploiting the global south” canard.

Yeah, I could see finding this unconvincing if you haven't read theory, history, or were just cool with benefiting from imperialism

[-] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 25 points 11 months ago

I mean even in the case of USSR they had to wait for more than a decade to actually get a livable apartment, not to mention severe lack of infrastructure...

But of course, better than people just kicked out to the streets. But then again, less is not none. The housing situation definitely didn't do USSR's overall economic status any favor.

People at least had somewhere to go

that's just moving the goal post, isn't it?

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Soviet Union? It was uncommon for a family of 6 to live in a small apartment. You can even see it in old soviet movies where apartments would be separated by curtains (common comedy trope).

[-] probablyaCat@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

I'm sure there were extra houses after all those people that starved to death.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago

In Communist countries people starve to death because of famine, in Capitalist countries people also strave to death because of famine while still starving to death after famines are over because they cant afford groceries.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago

Yeah that's called late stage Communism, which we have never achieved as humanity. Late stage Capitalism is currently pushing more and more folks into dangerous housing situations like the bottom right quadrant of this meme. Capitalism and Utopia are oxymorons while Communism and Utopia are synonymous.

[-] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Communism and your concept of utopia are synonymous. Communism and utopia are not synonymous.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Call me old fashion but no one living on the streets and having their basic needs met sounds pretty utopian to me.

[-] GrapesOfAss@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ah yes because there was no one living on the streets, yes because a propaganda told me that it must be true.

I guess killing literal millions of your own citizens is better than being homeless, huh?

[-] xerazal@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 months ago

There were still people that lived in the streets in the USSR. Also, the housing the USSR provided wasn't really that.. great... I watch a Russian YouTuber (NFKRZ) who has talked about Soviet architecture in not just Russia, but other former USSR countries and shows that yes it's good they were built, they weren't very well built.

The USSR had many problems, and bureaucracy was a big problem. I never understood why tankies love the USSR so much when the USSR didn't truly get rid of class. Those in the government lived like kings compared to the common man, who yes lived better than they had before but still not that well due to the bloated and mismanagement of the government.

Idk, the fact that they even had a centralized government like that seems like.. the opposite of communism to me.

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think what people don’t fully understand is that Marxism is meant to be scientific. That means that there will likely be many imperfect and failed attempts at building a socialist society before one comes along that is stable enough to outlast outside interference from capitalist states.

As such, most people I know who like the USSR are also it’s biggest critiques. Unfortunately, there is so much misinformation about the USSR that most discussions about it online are just about delineating truth from propaganda.

[-] probablyaCat@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

Yeah those soviets sure got rid of the homeless problem. Can't be homeless when you were intentionally starved to death.

[-] xor 8 points 11 months ago

The USSR and communism are separate things

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Slaps Table Thank You!!

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
1585 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45408 readers
378 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS