717

Former President Barack Obama cautioned against ignoring the complexities of the Israel-Hamas war, warning that “all of us are complicit.”

“If you want to solve the problem, then you have to take in the whole truth. And you then have to admit nobody’s hands are clean, that all of us are complicit to some degree,” he said in an excerpted interview with Pod Save America released Saturday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 year ago

This is bullshit. Israel's response is completely disproportionate. 2000+ children are dead in Gaza.

[-] jimbo@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I don't see where Obama said anything about things being proportionate, and I don't know what "proportionate" has to do with the fact that heinous acts have been taken by both sides.

[-] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

There's no "both sides" to this anymore. Almost ten times the people have been killed by Israel with almost all of them being civilians.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

How many times can you poke a bear before it decides it's done?

It's not an excuse. Israel's actions are absolutely disproportionate. I can argue either side, but that's exactly the point. Nobody's hands are clean. You don't have to condone Israel's actions to understand they were provoked.

There can never be peace without both sides admitting some fault. Two wrongs don't make a right. 9061 wrongs don't cancel out 1400 wrongs. That's not how any of this works.

What do you suggest Israel does? What do you suggest Palestinians in Gaza do? Until you think a little bit deeper, you can't just say dismissive, pithy things that only favor one side.

This isn't a sports team. You can't just pick a side and cheer for them no matter what.

[-] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

I'm not advocating for Hamas, I'm advocating for the non-combatants who just want to send their kids to school.

[-] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

As Martin Luther King famously said, "Violence is the language of the unheard."

[-] jimbo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There’s no “both sides” to this anymore. Almost ten times the people have been killed by Israel with almost all of them being civilians.

Israel has killed ten times the people compared to who? Oh yeah, the other "side", who also has killed a bunch of civilians.

[-] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I'm not talking a pro-Hamas position. I'm taking a pro-child position. You don't give a fuck about people though.

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Straight up overreaction to someone saying that the post was right, because it is.

It's self-referential meaning the western world is complicit in ALL the death there, both sides, because the Western allies of Israel have never forced them to the table to hammer out an actual solution.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot 9 points 1 year ago

both hamas and the israeli government want war not peace you can't reason with that

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] S_204@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You seem to not understand what a proportionate response in war is. Israel's goal is extermination of the terrorist threat in Gaza, their actions are proportional for those goals. Not lost in the calculation is the terrorists saying they intend on continuing their terror attacks on civilians, making a ceasefire all but impossible to institute.

The question of whether or not it's humane or ethical is a different question that should be debated.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

Terrorists consider civilian casualties to be a scorecard. Hamas benefits when there's Israeli civilian casualties. Hamas also benefits when there's Palestinian civilian casualties.

That's the whole point of taking hostages isn't it? To force Israel into a ground campaign which will cause Palestinian civilian casualties.

The military forces of civilized nations don't consider civilian casualties to be a victory no matter which side it's on. They have an objective and need to achieve that objective while minimizing civilian casualties. The objective of the IDF is to free the hostages. They will make an effort to minimize civilian casualties. But they must achieve that objective even while know civilian causalities are a certainty even when they make an to keep those casualties to a minimum.

This is the nature of war. And this is a war Hamas started. And remember there could be significantly fewer casualties (and a humanitarian ceasefire) if Hamas released the hostages.

But they won't do that because their objective is to maximize the number of Palestinian casualties because many people look at those casualties and become angry and want to support them.

Netanyahu will lose power because of 1400 Israeli deaths. Both Israeli and Palestinian civilian casualties are considered to be a failure by Israelis.

Both Israeli and Palestinian civilian casualties are considered a success by Hamas. They are psychopaths that know how people react to these numbers.

[-] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

Constantly bombs refugee camps, schools, and hospitals This is just war, bro. Yeah we have the 4th most sophisticated and accurate military on earth but we just can't help hitting civilians who just happen to be a minority in their own land...

Dude, the logical hoops you'll jump through to justify a genocide is extremely concerning.

Holocaust scholars all over the world have even condemned the bloodshed.

This isn't the cost of war. It's punishment. It's imperialism.

[-] jarfil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The objective of the IDF is to free the hostages. They will make an effort to minimize civilian casualties.

When a legitimate target is hiding among civilians, there are two possible responses:

  • Civilized nations: "F%ck, guess we'll have to wait until they move"
  • Non-civilized nations: "Collateral damage"

But they must achieve that objective even while know civilian causalities are a certainty

No "buts". Like it or not, defend it or not, that's what non-civilized nations do.

[-] MonkeyBusiness@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

I like your username

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Yep, genocide not cool Israel. The future will not be kind to you.

[-] AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

But only because they are the ones in power. If the positions of power were reversed, it'd be pretty much the same thing, except Hamas would be the one performing the apartheid and the genocide.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
717 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3451 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS