1835
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

All guns after 1899 are regulated chief. How about we fix our society instead of trying to collect millions and millions of lawfully owned firearms.

Here we can start with

Singler payer healthcare

Ending the war on drugs

Ending for profit prisons

Paying teachers more

Making a living wage law

Building more schools and funding under funded schools in inner cities where 95% of the violence happens

Creating safety nets for all kids under 18, so they don't have to worry about where their next meal is coming from or where they're going to sleep.

While we're at it, let's get RCV and ban insider trading for Congress thrown in as well.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

All guns after 1899 are regulated chief.

So no more mass shooting? Thanks, chief.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You're the one who acts like more laws will stop these shootings. They're not even enforcing the ones on the books...at the end of the day, you either tell the truth and have the military go door to door and round up the firearms, causing a civil war or you put in more feel good laws about firearms you think look scary.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Or you do a gun buyback program like Australia did. Then make firearms illegal without a license and a reason.

Then, like all other first world countries, you literally see murder plummeting.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Australia has around 1mil firearms in private hands...had a 60% turn in rate, and never had the murder rate we do anyways. If 60% of the USA turned in the firearms, you'd be left with over 100 million still out there.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It’s going to take 20-40 years to get into a comparable state to other first world countries. The difference is whether we start now or in 30 years. If we start in 30 years, it will take 50-70 years.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

No it would not, it would take hundreds of years a potential millions of lives, because you just started a civil war...and you're not going to like who the military sides with.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Whatever man. I don’t think you’re thinking your threats through. I think the leadership in the military; 1. Wouldn’t care about this because it doesn’t affect them, and 2. Are way more liberals than you give them credits, and 3. Are tired of the bullshit the Maga gun nuts are putting them through.

And I don’t believe a minute this would start a civil war. If Jan 6 didn’t start a civil war this definitely wouldn’t.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Most of the ground pounders are not liberals, most of the military doesn't just live on bases around the globe, most of the military lives in the same neighborhoods as guns owners...and Jan 6th was like 1k fucking idiots basically trying to destroy shit like children. Not millions of people who would over night become combatants because of a few people who want to kill people they disagree with.

[-] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Murder rates have been dropping in the US for decades, mass shootings are a small but high profile problem

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think a single one of the things you said would help curb gun violence or even school shootings at all. Your list is nice for everything else but how about addressing the glorification of guns and the shooters in the media? Maybe regulate the incitement of violence online and in the political discourse? How about blocking the radicalization of young men via dangerous conservative rhetoric online, eg. YouTube? Handle cases of bullying that go actively overlooked? Maybe intervene in child abuse and provide help for teenagers with poor mental health who feel ostracized? And the most important of all, block the easy access to these damn guns?

I bet someone better educated on this topic could come up with a better list. But my point is that you're dying on this tired hill of "it's not the guns" in this thread but you're failing to hit the nail on the head on everything else while being condescending towards everyone else:

stupid fudd sheep dog

Because you're not even interested in addressing the real issue (and fail to provide a reasonable, insightful solution) so long as nobody's touching the damn guns. What you're doing is akin to whataboutism. What the heck does insider trading in Congress have to do with anything?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I don't think a single one of the things you said would help curb gun violence or even school shootings at all.

Most "school" shootings are drug and gang related in inner cities, with handguns. Rifles are very rarely used, hell, they're very rarely used in murders in general. Most of our gun homicides are from gangs and drugs, not from random shootings. Ending the cycle of locking up drug users and keeping drugs illegal which is a major source of income for these gangs would start curbing the violence over night. Making sure kids have safety nets to go to and not gangs also would stop the flow of new members to gangs.

Your list is nice for everything else but how about addressing the glorification of guns and the shooters in the media?

How do you plan on doing that? You going to ban violence in movies and video games? Or ban rap/rock music? You going to ban the press from reporting on murders?

Maybe regulate the incitement of violence online and in the political discourse?

Uhh again how do you plan on doing this? You going to setup a great wall just like china has and enforce it via draconian police?

How about blocking the radicalization of young men via dangerous conservative rhetoric online, eg. YouTube?

Apparently you think only white christian male Republicans shoot people...

Handle cases of bullying that go actively overlooked?

Sure, I'm game for that, but I'd be covered with more funding so we have smaller classes...like I said above

Maybe intervene in child abuse and provide help for teenagers with poor mental health who feel ostracized?

Yea...I said that...safety nets for anyone under 18...

And the most important of all, block the easy access to these damn guns?

And how do you plan on doing that? Most guns used in crime are not purchased legally.

I bet someone better educated on this topic could come up with a better list. But my point is that you're dying on this tired hill of "it's not the guns" in this thread but you're failing to hit the nail on the head on everything else while being condescending towards everyone else:

I'm being condescending because the mass majority of people who want gun control, have no clue about A) the current laws and B) what our gun violence actually comes from. You clearly have shown you don't know in this very post.

Because you're not even interested in addressing the real issue (and fail to provide a reasonable, insightful solution)

I mean I did provide solutions that would actually do something, or society is broken, removing a plastic rifle that scares you, isn't going to solve it.

so long as nobody's touching the damn guns.

Pandoras box was opened, and you're not going to close it without causing a civil war. Taking rifles that make up a rounding error in the deaths each year is pants on head stupid. Because at the end of the day, you're not wanting to stop the deaths, you're wanting to get rid of something that scares you.

What you're doing is akin to whataboutism. What the heck does insider trading in Congress have to do with anything?

I mean it's not but ok...insider trading is where a lot of Congress gets their money, cut the flow means you cut their power and it means you're less likely to have greedy fucks who aren't in it to better society running the nation.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think the one part I agree with is the rifles vs handguns debate. In spite of their prominence in mass shootings, I think the thing we need to regulate more is handguns, not rifles. They're used for concealed carry - for bringing death to another person's home. Shotguns and rifles are more than adequate for home defense or hunting, and they're much less practical to steal or transport.

I think it was Australia that even restricted personal gun purchases to that category of weapon.

[-] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Wait, what?!? Nuance? GTFO of my guns bad echo chamber with your actually achievable solutions that I would normally otherwise support wholeheartedly!

[-] havokdj@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Because fix society hard, blame gunz instead.

It's ironic because guns at the end of the day are a tool to enact the will of it's user. Take the gun away, and you still have a problem to face.

All that guy is gonna do is find a gun illegally or something else to do what it is he is going to do. Mass shooters will steal box vans, people will go on knife stabbing sprees, police will become more oppressive as they have nothing to fear from the people anymore.

It's funny that I tell people this all the time. I would say I lean more toward the left, but liberals think that if you aren't 100% a liberal, you're a conservative, and that's why we will never experience the change we need to see in this country.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Always said, if the Dems ever want to control the gov. For a long time, just drop gun control and be in support of firearm rights. They'd wreck every election.

[-] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Your argument ignores the effectiveness of gun control in almost every other western nation.

[-] havokdj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, every country and their people is the same, including their culture and politics.

The US is a unique situation because unlike many of those other countries, the US continued to be incredibly saturated with guns and now we have firearms that are incredibly easy to access even outside of gun stores.

My argument ignored nothing, the US is not those countries, it's the US. Your argument also ignores something else, that being that those countries don't necessarily have lower murder rates than the US.

[-] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Too many guns causing issues is not a difficult problem to solve.

Don't necessarily have lower murder rates? The only 'european' country with a higher murder rate than than the USA is Russia. In fact the worst murder rate in europe in 2020 (year I've got the figures for) was held by Hungary, and even then it is half of what the USAs was.

[-] havokdj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, telling people that that they can't have guns, that'll just make the guns disappear.

Tell me exactly how you think that it should be implemented? Every approach I've ever seen has so far been either extremely unrealistic or a massive violation of several amendments.

Aside from that, removing guns is not going to lower the death rate by very much in comparison to European countries for other reasons, such as affordable healthcare, livable average/minimum wages, the people in Europe tend to live a higher quality of life than people in the US.

If people want to kill, they are going to use the easiest tool in their arsenal to do so, guns just happen to be number one on that list. Regulating guns only hurts the people, not criminals. Having a gun doesn't just make someone want to go out and kill people.

I want to make it very clear that I am not advocating for pro-gun anything, I am saying the issue lies with the many fundamental problems in the US. Living in the US today is incredibly stressful if you are not rich as shit, and it makes a lot of people crack.

[-] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Man you Americans just live in constant fear eh?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Nope, just like I don't live in fear of crashing every time I drive...but I still wear my seatbelt.

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
1835 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5410 readers
2326 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS