387

Archive Link from archive.today

Original link from Wired

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lowbird@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago

Maybe ban targeted advertizing, or that degree of spyware, for all companies, instead of opening that pandora's box of giving the power to ban social media apps altogether to the government.

Especially since the anti-tiktok bills actually include a lot of other stuff, up to and including making VPN's illegal.

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Targeted advertising isn't even on the same playing field of sketchyness as "massive and unchecked data collection by the Chinese government". Even mentioning it in the same sentence seems like an attempt at forum sliding.

And while I agree that the bill is an overreach and absolutely shouldn't go through in it's current form, it's exactly what would be required to achieve your authoritarian stance of banning all social media.

[-] Prunebutt@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Really? Because you could argue that targeted advertising lead to the January 6th riots.

The chinese government doesn't really benefit from data collection on western citizens. At least not if they don't work for intelligence agencies or want to proclaim that Taiwan is a country while being on mainland China.

[-] mrwiggles@prime8s.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

If you think they're not capable of if not already engaged in PSYOPS, I'd suggest you look deeper into targeted advertising and who is paying for it.

[-] Prunebutt@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

What is your point? Tell me, what the chinese government is supposedly doing with non-chinese user-data that is not worse than what the US surveillance capitalism is currently doing?

Do you seriously think that China spread misinformation about "stolen elections"?

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Every US bill includes a lot of other stuff. That's Congress's gig.

The US needs a tighter set of restrictions like what the EU has been passing out lately. But, that doesn't change the fact that ByteDance is a Chinese corporation, under the control of the Chinese government, and has no pretenses of data regulations.

[-] Prunebutt@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

ByteDance is corporated in the Cayman Islands, buddy.

They are about as cooperative with the CCP as Apple and Facebook are.

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
387 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
540 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS