730
submitted 2 years ago by TinyPizza@kbin.social to c/world@lemmy.world

Since October 7, more than 3,257 children have been reported killed, including at least 3,195 in Gaza, 33 in the West Bank, and 29 in Israel, according to the Ministries of Health in Gaza and Israel respectively. The number of children reported killed in just three weeks in Gaza is more than the number killed in armed conflict globally – across more than 20 countries – over the course of a whole year, for the last three years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 124 points 2 years ago

Yet some people still claim Israel is the victim! When the truth is that Israel is a terrorist state.

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 67 points 2 years ago

The ol' "you shot me in the foot so I burnt down your neighborhood and killed your entire extended family" defense. Unbeatable in the court of law.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago

I agree, except I think Israel is the one to both start and end this.
I burnt down your house and killed your family, but because you shot me in the foot, I'll burn down your neighborhood and kill your entire extended family.

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Don't forget how they'll cry to all their friends and relatives that they were the victims all along.

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

That one doesn't hold up as well in court though...

[-] SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

there's a history of violence on both sides since the post-ww2 era. no one really has time or any real inclination to attend court

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

Ah the ol' "history of violence and I've got more killing to do, so ain't no time for court" defense. An interesting strategy. Suppose it depends on the judge.

[-] SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

it's got more to do with the accused/accuser - neither are going to visit a courtroom (ie: the hague).

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

come on man, you're not even following the format of the joke here.

[-] SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago
[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

no need to apologize. Sorry if that came off dickish. I was trying to entice you into joining the black humor.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 years ago

People see will see these numbers and still argue "they are showing restraint, if Israel was really evil they would just carpet bomb them all." Like what the fuck is this then?

[-] Kashbus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ministries of Health in Gaza is Operated by Hamas, so it would not be outlandish to say these numbers are being inflated in order to push public opinion and international support

EDIT: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/10/24/hamas-israel-death-toll-health-ministry-trustworthy-reuters/

“Hamas has now been in charge of Gaza for 16 years. It has squeezed the life out of honesty and probity. Any health official stepping out of line and not giving the death tolls that Hamas wants reported to journalists risks serious consequences. I’m not denying there are civilians being killed. At all, including many children. That’s verifiable. What is not verifiable are the numbers that emerge throughout the day from Gaza of new death tolls — 700 killed in the last 24 hours, 500 killed in the Ahli hospital car park blast, 5,000 killed since October 8. Hamas has a clear propaganda incentive to inflate civilian casualties as much as possible. There was a time when the figures from the ministry could be relied upon. The doctors and administrators knew what they were doing.”

This is an area of credibility that is still up in the air with reliable sources claiming that it is both reliable and unreliable numbers that are being published. However none of it though dismisses the fact that innocents are dying from Israel’s War with Hamas, innocents that contain children

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

Historically they stand up to even Israels secondary verification. From the AP:

“The numbers may not be perfectly accurate on a minute-to-minute basis,” said Michael Ryan, of the World Health Organization’s Health Emergencies Program. “But they largely reflect the level of death and injury.”
In previous wars, the ministry's counts have held up to U.N. scrutiny, independent investigations and even Israel's tallies.

[-] Kashbus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Historically is not the same as current: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/10/24/hamas-israel-death-toll-health-ministry-trustworthy-reuters/

"Hamas has now been in charge of Gaza for 16 years. It has squeezed the life out of honesty and probity. Any health official stepping out of line and not giving the death tolls that Hamas wants reported to journalists risks serious consequences. I'm not denying there are civilians being killed. At all, including many children. That's verifiable. What is not verifiable are the numbers that emerge throughout the day from Gaza of new death tolls — 700 killed in the last 24 hours, 500 killed in the Ahli hospital car park blast, 5,000 killed since October 8. Hamas has a clear propaganda incentive to inflate civilian casualties as much as possible. There was a time when the figures from the ministry could be relied upon. The doctors and administrators knew what they were doing."

[-] BillygotTalent@feddit.de 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Of course they are also the victim. Hamas slaughtered adults and children with no remorse. Now Israel is returning the favor.

Both sides are aggressors and victims.

[-] chepox@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 years ago

If someone shoots your dog and then you go to their house and shoot their dog. Are you justified? Perhaps. But you are still shooting a dog. And that makes you a dog killer.

2 wrongs do not make a right. Never will.

[-] aquinteros@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

yeah they aren't shootin up the dog, they are slaughtering their entire family and burning their home, the proportions are a bit off here

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Isn't that what the commenter above you just said.

both sides are the victims and the aggressors.

[-] Duxon@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

How many Americans were killed by Nazi Germany vs the other way around?

Intentions and moral frameworks matter, not only the sheer numbers of casualties.

[-] Kashbus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

It's a bit more complicated than that no?

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

No, it’s not complicated at all actually.

[-] Kashbus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

If you find it not complicated then you are either uneducated and not impartial

I hope for the former and that you will educate yourself (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict)

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

Apartheid is not complicated. Sorry if that’s hard for you to understand.

[-] Kashbus@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Article 34 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV states that the taking of hostages is prohibited

I'm sorry that you are so clouded by hate

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

Israel is an apartheid state. Apartheid is the root cause of the entire conflict. It’s also illegal under international law. This isn’t hard.

[-] Kashbus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I agree. But Israel's apartheid actions are not just cause to enact rocket strikes, torture, suicide attacks, mass taking of hostages, mass attacks on innocents, or the beheading of children

It is hard, because there is no one side that has so far not committed a war crime

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

You seem to be confused. Explaining to you the root cause of the conflict is not the same thing as justifying ongoing violence. The simple truth is that this conflict will only end when Israel decides to end the apartheid.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

What do you mean with "ending the apartheid". Which concrete actions do you believe are apartheid in the area?

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

The intention and systematic oppression and discrimination of Palestinians amounts to the internationally recognized crime of apartheid.

Palestinians have no say in what happens to them. Israel restricts their freedom of movement in Gaza and the West Bank. Israel intentionally limits their access to clean drinking water, food, and other resources. Palestinians were forced from their homes en masse in 1948. To this day Palestinians continue to be kicked out of their homes and segregated from encroaching Israeli settlements. The Israeli state enforces this system of oppression through criminal and illegal violence. I could go on but you get the point.

This isn’t just my opinion. It’s the international consensus and the opinion of Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and experts at the UN.

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It's becoming quite simple...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] avater@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Well they are the victims of a terror attack by the Hamas and have a right to defend themselves also not by any means of course...this conflict has two participants who are equally involved in this conflict, your point of view seems quite one sided to me.

[-] avater@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Obviously there are individual victims, but as a nation Israel is mostly responsible as those who have all the power.

[-] Guydht@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Having power = the ones responsible?

They have no power in Gaza. They haven't had any for the last 15 years. The ones in control of Gaza and its population id Hamas, and the ones who doesn't take care of poor Palestinians is Hamas. And the ones who get foreign aid and uses it for rockets instead of infrastructure is Hamas.

Power != Responsibility. Life isn't spiderman.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They are using way superior power only to oppress, that's why they have more responsibility.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pavokk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

Israel has all the power over Gaza. They control who or what goes in and out. The way Palestinians have been treated I'm not surprised at all that they have ended up with extremist leaders.

[-] Guydht@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They control everything in and out huh... Does that include the rockets and anti-tank ammunition Hamas has?

Give me a break. They had a free hand running their own region for over a decade, and that's what came out of it. Lots of military means - zero safe zones for civilians.

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
730 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46162 readers
2612 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS