567
submitted 11 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is technically the case everywhere.

Healthcare is one of those things that will consume all available resources, and we can't do that.

Consider someone that requires round the clock, individual care. They are consuming the entire economic output of more than three people to care for someone that will have no more. I know there's a lot of communists here, but communism doesn't change that fact.

What if we could keep someone alive for $1M per day? How long should we do it? We shouldn't, and "death panels" are how that needs to be decided.

You can talk about price gouging, but really high end medical care is akin to magic. It takes very smart people to do it, and something like an MRI requires liquid helium to remain superconducting. That's just extremely expensive.

Edit: this place is really weird. So many down votes. No argument against it. Very toxic.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

While this is technically true. Back in reality land they were found to be automating the process of groundless denials having doctors lie about having examined dozens of cases despite having spent all of 10 seconds in a screen clicking deny all. Our current situation IS death panels and not just for the dying.

[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Sure. That's not really a death panel though. That's the inefficiency of lots of systems. If you make someone jump through enough hoops, they'll give up. That saves money.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Well EU has pretty good healthcare but noons pays 3x market value of their car for single ambulance.

[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No one is talking about that. Healthcare has a budget. You have to distribute that budget equitably.

It's a more generalized, non emergency version of triage.

Some people will die no matter what you do. Don't waste resources on them. Some people will recover if you do nothing. Don't waste resources on them.

Some people will recover if you spend resources on them and die if your don't. Use your resources on them.

There's always a cost benefit tradeoff.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Aside from you though 🫠

Healthcare is one of those things that will consume all available resources, and we can’t do that.

Consider someone that requires round the clock, individual care. They are consuming the entire economic output of more than three people to care for someone that will have no more.

I just pointed that it doesn't consume so much resources in EU as in US. So it can afford better care for longer period of time. And by that i mean tenfold in some cases.

And guess what, insurance companies paying for that make huge profits yearly as well.

I'm just pointing to system that can afford to keep patients alive without killing them because they or others can't afford to pay for them while maintaining high quality care.

Off topic

Edit: this place is really weird. So many down votes. No argument against it. Very toxic.

I didn't down vote you if that matters 😉

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
567 points (100.0% liked)

News

22916 readers
3257 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS