1406
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I support some common sense restrictions on abortion... I don't think anyone should be able to just up and demand the death of what is arguably a human life without a good reason.

This is not that, hell it couldn't be anymore obvious that the GOP doesn't care about life or the safety of the child, they just want as many rules on the books as possible to let them punish "Enemies of the party"

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

See, what you call "common sense" restrictions is just you sticking your nose in a woman's reproductive business.

Mind your own business. Leave a woman's health care up to a woman and her doctor. That's common sense.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I don't care what spin you put on it pal. No one should be allowed to kill a human being on a whim.

Now if there's something medically wrong with the fetus or the pregnancy is too taxing to be safely brought to term, that's different.

But the fact that you're being upvoted and I'm being downvoted shows that the wackos from Reddit have finally discovered Lemmy

[-] I_LOVE_VEKOMA_SLC@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

No, it shows that most people are reasonable and understand that a woman who decides for whatever reason that she isn't ready for the commitment of parenthood, that is her business.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

You know what's better than murder? Safe Surrender Laws

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Wacko spin, eh? Thank you for so clearly identifying yourself as a reproductive authoritarian for all the women on Lemmy. If you think many women get an abortion "on a whim," then you have bought into the right-wing propaganda.

BTW, saying that the decision to abort should be made between a woman and her doctor means that medical ethics becomes the guiding framework, as opposed to criminal law. The state has no business criminalizing reproductive health.

Canada has the best abortion law, which is to say it has no law on abortion. And yet, Canadian doctors are somehow not killing babies at 36 weeks "on a whim." Hmmm, what could possibly explain that?

Gee-wiz, Cletus, maybe we don't have to criminalize abortion in order to get "common sense" behavior.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Wow, strawman much?

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the consequences of your actions.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Actually I vote Democrat exclusively because I'm aware that the GOP are domestic terrorists acting on behalf of Russian Homophobes, nice try.

See while I think just letting ANYONE get an abortion is morally wrong and that the procedure should only be done in extreme cases, like rape, ectopic pregnancy, incest, major deformity, and the like, etc....

I also realize Republicans are the opposite extreme in that they want NO ABORTIONS AT ALL and aren't big on the concept of gender equality.

So I vote Democrat despite the Abortion issue, as I realize neither party has a satisfactory answer to it, but the Democrat Answer causes less problems.

It's called "Don't let Perfect be the enemy of Good"

[-] sapient_cogbag@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago

Do you think people (in particular, yourself) should be forced by state violence to donate their organs to someone who needs it to survive? Especially when the forced donation process involves significant risk to your own life and health (though i do not think that aspect particularly important for my own reasoning, personally ^.^).

Because advocating for """reasonable""" restrictions on abortion is advocating for forcing someone to act as, essentially, a breeding pod, forced to donate their body and organs.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I think Organ Donation should be an Opt Out rather than an Opt In.

Also Organ Donation isn't done till after the person is dead, so your argument makes no sense.

Anyway, that aside, if you are in a position to save another person or prevent their death, and either don't or even just expedite what was already going to happen... You're a killer in my eyes.

[-] SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

How many kidneys have you donated?

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So you haven't donated any, you're trying to evade the question.

Anyway, that aside, if you are in a position to save another person or prevent their death, and either don't or even just expedite what was already going to happen... You're a killer in my eyes

That means, by your own logic, you're a killer.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Whatever, I really don't care about thr opinions of some hypocrite killer.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not a hypocrite, I am merely not suicidal. If I were to donate my organs while I was still alive, I would be putting myself into unnecessary risk. Meaning I cannot blindly give them away, if I were to give them away at all, I would have to do so specifically because someone needed them and came to me for help with the understanding that if I refused they would die.

If you were paying attention, you would know that I do not advocate for a total ban on abortion, if bringing the human child to term is a non-negligible threat to the owner of the womb than an abortion isn't just fine, it should be encouraged by a medical profession.

However if that is not the case, then an abortion would child murder.

Kinda like how if someone dying of kidney failure asked for my kidneys and I said no, I'm basically telling them to drop dead.

My logic isn't inconsistent, you merely belong to a vocal minority of people who value self freedom over the lives of others. A vocal minority that was quite loud on reddit but seems to have migrated to Lemmy.

The kind of nut who would compare licenses to drive to licenses to use a toaster

[-] SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Kinda like how if someone dying of kidney failure asked for my kidneys and I said no, I'm basically telling them to drop dead.

Currently, 17 people die each day on the organ transplant list. I'm representing one of them, and coming directly and specifically to you. Will you donate a kidney?

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am not a lawyer, however I have no reason to believe that this is a sincere request. Instead I believe this is an attempt to propose a Preposterous question without evidence, in order to use my answer against me. And for that reason I refuse to answer it.

[-] SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, saying that anyone who doesn't donate an organ to someone else is a killer is prepostorous, I agree.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Claiming to be rational and twisting someone else's words around, do not go hand in hand.

[-] sapient_cogbag@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So you think a corpse should have more morphological autonomy than a living person?

People can also organ donate while alive lol ;p

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So you're a forced birther. Got it.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

No I just am one of the people who don't think it's Misogynistic to have a problem with literal murder.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
1406 points (100.0% liked)

News

23215 readers
3208 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS