1422
submitted 1 year ago by matcha_addict@lemy.lol to c/memes@lemmy.ml

This meme is from 2004. History repeats itself.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Anamana@feddit.de 159 points 1 year ago

I'm mostly pro Palestine, but using this picture with the subtitle 'history repeats itself' and therefore portraying what happened at the festival, and the other slaughter missions as a tiny goofy missile, feels kinda disproportionate. Don't you think?

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No. Hundreds of thousands will die in response to hundreds dying. The comic is still fully accurate even if "a single missile" is still condemnable.

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago

I'm not talking about who shoots the biggest rockets and who kills more people here. I'm talking about portraying a literal slaughter fest as a tiny lil rocket, mosquito sting or whatever, which causes no harm at all. This is not the right comic & subtitle to show what happened 'today'. At least in my opinion. Because it's not disproportionate to what happened.

But feel free to disagree, it you think it is. To me OP is more or less mocking the victims and I find it distasteful. Especially because people were involved, who weren't even culturally part of this ethnical conflict in the first place.

And no I'm not part of team both sides bad, because this conflict involves more than two sides and in the end people in Gaza suffer the most.

[-] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 26 points 1 year ago

Where did I mock the victims? Do not put words in my mouth. Can you not make a half-sound argument without lying?

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By disproportianting what happened. How you can not see that is beyond me. Just try to reflect on what you posted. Slaughtering hundred civilians = tiny mosquito rocket.

'History repeats itself'.. but this level didn't happen before.

[-] GitProphet@lemmy.sdfeu.org 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From what I can see, @matcha_addict@lemy.lol is not mocking the victims of this tragedy, but rather criticising the media for writing about the israeli deaths caused by the hamas attack, yet hardly making a sound about the palestine deaths caused by israel.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It IS NOT a disproportionate representation. THAT'S THE POINT.

I am very sorry you fail to realize what death Israel will doll out in response, but this comic is completely accurate in the proportions displayed.

You LITERALLY have fighter jets and bombers striking back against ... paragliders with guns...

Again, NO ONE except fucking losers are saying Hamas did anything good. That doesn't make murdering dozens of thousands of Palestinians OK.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 37 points 1 year ago

"history repeats itself" as in the people who only condemn needless killing when Hamas does it, but ignore the Palestinian cause the rest of the time.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

It's almost like motivation, methods, intentions, and circumstances matter and not just body count. For example, intentionally targeting civilians to maximize civilian deaths is not the same as accidentally killing civilians with collateral damage while trying to minimize civilian deaths.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Guess which side this is, then:

Scores of people, mainly women and children, have been killed in multiple air strikes on the main road connecting north and south Gaza, as people carried out an Israeli order to flee their homes.

According to the Ministry of Health, at least 70 people have been killed in three separate air strikes on the road, with the latest killing at least 40.

The Israeli army said in a statement on Friday that civilians must leave Gaza City in the north, and that they would not be allowed to return "until we say so" and until "a statement is issued allowing this".

However, locals have reported a number of attacks on the Salah al-Din Road since then. Survivors, speaking to local media, implored others not to make the journey for fear of being targeted by the Israelis.

"Do not leave," a distraught survivor of the attacks told local media.

"They bombed the convoy. They bombed it on Salah al-Din Road. They bombed the ambulances."

Another survivor said the attacks were a "direct targeting of women and children".

"I was in the truck. There were about 200 people. 90 percent were women and children. We took the main road that the entire world knew we were taking. My entire family were with me. Out of nowhere, they dropped a bomb. Everything was black and I lost conscience for 10 mins," they told local media.

"When I woke up I saw a mother lying with her baby, whose brain was right next to him. I heard the ambulances then they bombed again. I took cover and after a few minutes tried to check the damage, then they bombed again."

[-] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 30 points 1 year ago

When Israeli soldiers are bragging about raping and torturing people, it's very clear what their intentions are

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Source?

That's troubling if true, and if it is, do you believe said soldiers speak for the entire Israeli government? Hamas's atrocities are official policy.

[-] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 10 points 1 year ago

Hamas' official policy is resisting occupation and massacre, not committing it.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hamas’ official policy is resisting occupation and massacre, not committing it.

Hamas' official policy is genocide and they just committed a massacre last week.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago

while trying to minimize civilian deaths

If that's what they're trying to do, they really fucking suck at it.

And the motivation, methods, intentions, and circumstances don't matter a bit to the victims and their loved ones.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] istdaslol@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago

This is nothing new. Often the actions of Israel are portrayed in the worst way possible. As a quick example: The UN considers everyone under 18 a child, hamas starts recruiting at 14. When the IDF does a raid and kills one of these members the Arab media screams „Isreal has slaughtered children“

This is why I switched to being more pro Israel

[-] Veltoss@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Ignoring of course the countless children they kill who aren't part of hamas. The ratio of children to adults killed by Israel can only be reached by doing it on purpose.

You "switching sides" because you don't like the media reporting on these murders is a joke and I can only assume a lie, because it doesn't make sense.

The media reporting stuff doesn't change what is happening nor the morals and ethics involved. Silly to blame the media for you choosing to support the murder of innocents.

[-] istdaslol@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

It’s on purpose, but on the hamas side, they use children and civilians in general as human meat shields. They fire their rockets from schools and hospitals, hide their equipment in residential areas. Just to scream „Israel bad“ when one of these outpost gets attacked

[-] blazera@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

How convenient, when israel kills civilians its because palestine is hiding behind them, in their own country, being bombed. Its only heartless civilian massacres the other way around.

[-] istdaslol@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

It seems so, if you gloss over the fact that Hamas is using unguided rockets to throw in the general direction of Israel and Israel is using precision ammunition to target the places the first were fired from.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

So civilians killed by israel are even more egregious then. Like that strike on evacuees that just happened.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're suggesting that intent doesn't matter, causing accidental civilian deaths while defending one's self is an act morally equivalent to intentionally targeting and murdering civilians. I disagree. In most legal systems and ethical systems intent matters a lot.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

And palestinians are defending themselves from the much deadlier attacks and long term military occupation of their country and borders.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

Don’t try to claim moral superiority in a blood feud where both sides commit atrocities.

[-] istdaslol@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Im mainly here to give the „Hamas is a resistance movement“ crowd a reality check

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

They are a violent resistance movement, opposing a violent colonialist movement.

[-] istdaslol@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Israel is expanding into the West Bank, not Gaza. They are resisting nobody. Israel even removed all of its citizens from that area. They are terrorists. They are founded by and doing the bidding for Iran.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

If you see this as a black and white conflict, there’s no point in taking to you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

As if the cartoon this thread is about wasn't claiming moral superiority for the other side.

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes the Israelis don't kill children for throwing rocks and then call them soldiers

[-] Franzia 16 points 1 year ago

I'd like to add even more context: ~45% of Palestine is under the age of 14.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Yes, it's not a perfect caricature, Crimea river

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Rules of the internet: you can safely discard everything that comes before the ", but"

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If ignoring context helps you feed your bias, go for it.

[-] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 8 points 1 year ago

The soundness of your argument should not depend on your stance. It is a common tactic to state that you are "pro-X" but criticize X, because people are more likely to sympathize with your criticism that way. The commenter you replied to is simply reminding us of this.

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
1422 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45666 readers
611 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS