641
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

22 Democrats Sponsor a Bill That Could Censor Abortion Info From the Internet::The Kids Online Safety Act is “a blank check” for Republican AGs to "intimidate any way they can," a digital civil liberties advocate told Jezebel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 92 points 1 year ago

Censor something from the internet? good luck lol

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

"The Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

That was before the internet was five big websites showing content scraped from the other four.

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I would argue most of internet is already being censored... probably for good reasons.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

"Good reasons" for the people in power.

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You are right, most of it is probably to keep people in power and the servants in line, but there are also a lot of situations in which we actively ask for censorship. Moderators are needed for a reason. Censorship is our only relatively effective tool to counter disinformation campaigns and fake news. Even search engines censor their results either to avoid lawsuits or to prevent certain situations, like someone asking for suicide methods is redirected to sites telling him why life is worth it.

I still understand this is a double edged sword and im not sure if the risks involved with compulsory censorship are worth losing our internet freedom, but I do understand this shit is needed on certain situations

[-] floppade@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

In a literal level, this person is not being unreasonable. Facebook moderators and the psychological conditions they face as a result of their work are a good indication of that.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 year ago

Now imagine if they used the law to force Google not to provide any results in a search for abortion. While it may not remove content from the Internet, it effectively removes access to it.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This shows we need an open source search engine that anybody can whip up. To all the devs and volunteers out there, please make something like this, if there's one already, I'll see if I can contribute to the project.

[-] floppade@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

In the meantime, you can use something like ProtonVPN to make sites think you’re not in the US. Google uses your IP address to determine your location and implement regulations based on that. You get better privacy options when it thinks you’re in Europe too.

[-] BluJay320 13 points 1 year ago
[-] figaro@lemdro.id 13 points 1 year ago

A 16 year old girl who wants to know what to do after getting pregnant does not

[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Lol, this is very doable and happens in the western world all the time.

Even propaganda is rampant here.

Maybe it's not gone, but it might as well be if 98% of the population can't find it.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You say that but the internet of today is a far more "sanitized" place than it once was.

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
641 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59612 readers
3048 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS