622
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They barely improve noise pollution, the loudest factor on a moving car are the tires. If you use electricity out of a coal powered power plant you just outsource the air pollution. And I can't imagine that it is healthy to live around a the mines that are needed to get all the ressources to build the battery and the car itself.

This is worse then 'nothing is perfect', this is lying to yourself to continue to fuck up the planet and fuck up people who are not you. Congratulations on your "cleaner city".

Edit: maybe tell me where I am wrong instead of just downvoting. I think I have a valid point to diskuss.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Oh boy, you clearly never had a semi truck engine breaking down a hill 30 yards from your house at 3am in the morning.

[-] __dev@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

To be fair, they said "moving car". They're correct; cars moving at high speed produce significantly more tyre noise than engine noise. Larger vehicles have much more engine noise, so the speed at which tyre noise dominates is also higher.

References:

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Like I said, you never had a truck engine break in front of your house. It is significantly louder than any tire noise. It almost sounds like a machine gun.

[-] __dev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No I haven't, because where I live we've outlawed using jake brakes within cities due to the noise - except when adequate muffling is installed. Again we're talking about cars, not trucks, so jake brakes aren't relevant anyway.

[-] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

I live near a road with a 100 km/h speed limit, all I hear is the tires on the road, no engine. I guess an electric car could be even louder, as they are heavier. The loudest vehicles here are the trucks, but again, can't hear the engine, just the sound of the tires. Especially when it rains and the road is wet.

I don't know what 'breaking down the hill' means, but of course there are scenarios where combustion engines are louder. When they wait on a red light e.g. My point is: EVs suck as much as combution engine cars, they are both loud.

Why not opt for the option of more public transport, bikes and cars only where they are absolutly neccessary - for all I care EVs.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I live 100 yards away from an interstate highway in the US. Looking at it right now. Yeah the tire noise is real too. But I got use to it, it's soft and consistent.

Engine breaking is when a truck uses its engine in lower gear to slow down the truck. It's really loud and sounds like a machine gun.

[-] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

My favorite solution for cargo transport is loud as well, trains aren't exactly known for their silent behaviour. Difficult to find the best solution there.

Regarding the topic: I don't seem to be that off with my feeling, according to this site 50 % of the noise of a car comes from tires. And it gets worse at higher speeds and with more mass. I think EVs are more silent than ICEs but still far from good if they can be avoided by better solutions like bikes, public transport and city planning.

Of course I wouldn't want to take away your sleeping aid, a nice constant white noise of tires can be nice. But maybe a white noise recording would be better for the environment.

[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Your comment raises some valid points about the environmental impact of electric vehicles (EVs), but there are a few misconceptions that need to be addressed.

Firstly, regarding noise pollution, while it's true that tire noise can be a significant source of noise from a moving car, especially at higher speeds, it's not accurate to say that EVs barely improve noise pollution. EVs are generally quieter than conventional vehicles, especially at lower speeds. This can significantly reduce noise pollution in urban areas, where speeds are often low.

Secondly, the point about electricity from coal-powered plants is a common argument, but it oversimplifies the issue. Yes, if an EV is charged using electricity from a coal-powered plant, it's effectively outsourcing some of its emissions. However, the overall emissions are still typically lower than those from conventional vehicles. Furthermore, the electricity grid is getting cleaner over time as we shift towards renewable sources, which will further reduce the emissions from EVs.

As for the environmental impact of mining for resources to build batteries and cars, this is indeed a concern. However, it's important to note that conventional vehicles also require resource extraction for their production, and the extraction and refining of oil for fuel is a major source of environmental damage. Moreover, the battery production process is becoming more efficient, and there are ongoing efforts to improve the recycling of batteries.

Lastly, the assertion that advocating for EVs is "lying to yourself to continue to fuck up the planet and fuck up people who are not you" is a rather harsh judgement. While it's true that EVs are not a perfect solution and have their own environmental impact, they are generally considered a step in the right direction towards reducing our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigating climate change.

Citations: [1] When we switch to electric vehicles everything is going ... https://www.reddit.com/r/Showerthoughts/comments/oqpalp/when_we_switch_to_electric_vehicles_everything_is/ [2] Noise is all around us https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36024887 [3] Electric cars noise pollution https://www.fastcompany.com/90774779/heres-what-science-says-about-electric-cars-and-their-impact-on-noise-pollution [4] Answers https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/international-schools/pdfs/ilower-secondary/exploring-science-international/ExploringScienceInternationalAnswers/int_esws_at_y7_ap_sb_answers_ttpp.pdf [5] How far do I need to be from a highway/parkway to no ... https://ask.metafilter.com/271697/How-far-do-I-need-to-be-from-a-highway-parkway-to-no-longer-hear-it [6] Answers SP1a Vectors and scalars https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1584024880/sydenhamlewishamschuk/agtqfqee1mgv0nnk165x/SP1andSP2answers.pdf

[-] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your answer! My points are a result of my thoughts without looking anything up. You are much more thorough.

So EVs are loud, but ICEs are louder. The production of EVs is dirty, but producing and running ICEs is dirtier. Running ICEs now could damage the nature, because a lot of power is still produced with coal, but the future will fix it.

EVs are better than ICEs. But saying that EVs are a step in the right direction feels very wrong. We have one big problem - 'car infrastructure'. And giving the avarage Joe/Jane the idea, that they can better the world by using EVs is a waste of time and energy that could be used to go in a much better direction: public transport, bikes, well planned cities. I don't think Joe wants to sell his new EV, even if he had alternatives, and he will continue to vote for more roads and parking spaces.

But compromises are important: I would recommend everyone, who HAS to use a car with no alternatives and whose car is not up to good environment standards anymore, to buy an EV instead of an ICE.

[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

in a perfect world cars would disappear all together I agree. But for the short term we need to not let perfect be the enemy of good. People aren't giving up their cars anytime soon, but maybe we can shepherd them into a slightly less shitty version for the time being. Plus having EVs and more solar on roofs will speed up our ability to reduce our coal addiction, which right now is the biggest threat to humanity.

Hopefully we'll see the transition largely away from cars in time with better public infrastructure. it's a complex problem.

[-] vivadanang@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

This is a fantastically ignorant response in damn near every aspect. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong, fuck you, I suspect you're a shell or exxon employee.

[-] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Good that you took the time to respond 'fuck you' to me, I hope it makes you feel better.

Sadly your response didn't make me think all that much, 'wrong wrong wrong' and insults aren't great arguments after all.

[-] vivadanang@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago
[-] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I really don't know what those words mean.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Where I live I feel like I’m encountering more and more cars that have been modded to be VERY loud by replacing their exhaust pipes, adding exhaust tips, etc. Just about every time I’m driving on a highway I seem to spot cars like this…

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
622 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9624 readers
793 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS