644
submitted 1 year ago by 14specks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Yinchie@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Less people on earth means we will hit the Co2 goals faster.

[-] ShesDayDreaming@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

No it does not, 70% of emissions is by corporations

[-] fart@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

definitely not agreeing with Yinchie as i think more humans = more innovation = less climate change, but i think it's important to remember that corporations serve the people generally... the reason these corporations exist is because of market demand from people, individual human people

[-] slampisko@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes but no one is demanding the corporations to release tons of carbon into the atmosphere. The demand is (for example) "I want to get from home to work and then back" and the onus should be on the corporation to make sure that demand is met sustainably.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

But corporations are driven by the consumption of people. Without people there would be no consumption and no corporations.

[-] Yinchie@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Wrong. Humans are the cause. And corporations does not generate more than the farmers. Less humans and less farms equals lower co2 emissions. #facts

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

In that case, let's go straight to nuclear war! Destroy the human population

[-] sorenant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ah the Genghis Khan method of environmentalism.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
644 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32075 readers
722 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS