302
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Republican US senator Tommy Tuberville has said he will continue to block hundreds of military leadership appointments despite the Hamas attack on Israel, a close American ally, that has triggered a deadly escalation in the Middle East conflict.

Tuberville has for several months put a hold on at least 300 military nominees, which are typically confirmed in a routine manner by the US senate. The blockade is a protest over a Pentagon policy which facilitates abortions for service members and dependents.

The former Auburn University football team coach turned Alabama senator has indicated he will maintain the blockade even in the wake of Hamas’ assault on Israel, in which at least 700 mostly civilians are thought to have died, including several hundred revelers killed at a music festival, while dozens more people are believed to have been taken hostage. Israel has responded with airstrikes on the Gaza Strip that authorities in the penned-in territory say has killed at least 493 Palestinian people, including entire families sheltering in their apartments.

US military appointments currently in limbo include top officers slated to command American forces in the Middle East as well as two picks for the joint chiefs of staff. Separately, the US also does not have an ambassador to Israel, its close ally, with Democrats calling for a swift confirmation of the nominee, Jack Lew.

Joe Biden has previously called Tuberville’s stance “totally irresponsible”, and the president accused him of undermining the strength and capabilities of the US military. But the Alabama senator said on Sunday that even the attack on Israel would not shift his position.

“The Pentagon clearly thinks forcing taxpayers to facilitate abortion is more important than confirming their top nominees without a vote,” a Tuberville spokesperson told NBC. “They could end this situation today by dropping their illegal and immoral policy and get everyone confirmed rapidly, but they refuse.”

Invoking a name Tuberville calls himself because of his prior job, the spokesperson added: “If the Biden administration wants their nominees confirmed then Senate Democrats can do what Coach just did in September and file a cloture petition to force a vote.”

Military nominees are usually bundled together and confirmed by a voice vote in the Senate to speed along appointments but under the senate’s rules a single senator can hold up this process. Chuck Schumer, the Democratic Senate majority leader, has said that individual votes on each of the nominees would eat up a huge amount of time and urged Republicans to get Tuberville “in line”.

Tuberville objects to a Pentagon policy that does not itself perform abortions but provides time off and travel assistance to members of the military that require reproductive healthcare.

The US secretary of defense, Lloyd Austin, has said that the policy safeguards the healthcare and combat readiness of service members and is widely popular within the military.

Abortion has been effectively banned in several states following the US supreme court’s decision to overturn the longstanding Roe v Wade precedent last year – a move decried by progressives but lauded by conservatives like Tuberville.

“The severity of the crisis in Israel underscores the foolishness of senator Tuberville’s blockade,” said Jack Reed, a Democrat who leads the Senate armed services committee.

“The United States needs seamless military leadership in place to handle dangerous situations like this and senator Tuberville is denying it. This is no time for petty political theater, and I again urge Republican colleagues to help actively end senator Tuberville’s damaging blockade.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago

Every conservative is complicit. Every one of them supports this blockage. We should only refer to this as a conservative block and not a Tuberville block.

[-] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

I agree with your intent but I refuse to call them conservative.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 21 points 1 year ago

They're conservatives in the Wilhoit sense:

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition ... There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” --Frank Wilhoit"

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Definitely. Tuberville, who is safe in Alabama, gives a convenient out for every other conservative Senator. Make no mistake, they support Tuberville.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

If the Democrats brought up a rules change vote and it failed, you could make that argument. Since they won't bother with that since they can make political hay out of this themselves, who really cares.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

It's completely normal to not bring a vote when you know you don't have the support to pass. It would be a waste of time.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's very naive to believe that is the case here. There's been no attempt to even drum up the support for a vote(they'd likely succeed with that btw). The Dems like this sideshow.

Edit: to quote Chuck

“The bottom line is, this is a problem created by Republicans, and it’s up to them to solve it,” he told reporters. “We’re not going to shift the burden to Democrats.”

[-] pahlimur@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, they just aren't as stupid and unorganized as Republicans. They can do basic math and have discussions in good faith so they know it's not worth bringing it to a vote they know will fail. You are expecting them to be chest pounding idiots when you know they aren't.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So why did they bring the rules change for the filibuster and not this exactly? I don't see how anyone could argue this in good faith.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, thank you. We need to stop pretending there are "moderates" in the GOP.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
302 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
2857 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS