448
submitted 1 year ago by honeynut@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 207 points 1 year ago

Want to ignore 26 laws to destroy protected wildlife refuge in order to build Trump's wall for him? Sure! No problem!

Want to do anything that might benefit the poor? "No you stupid progressive. This must be your first election because you don't understand how anything works. Everyone knows that we need a quorum of both houses to convene in a graveyard at midnight under a blood moon on the third Tuesday of the month, in accordance with the infield fly rule. Then, we wait for the appearance of the Great Pumpkin, so that we may know how to proceed."

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago

Here's what looks like an answer: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/jun/30/joe-biden-forced-build-donald-trumps-border-wall/

TLDR: This is a 2019 law passed by Congress during the baby hands administration. The Biden administration has been pretty careful not to overstep other branches of government(I think as a direct response to how flagrantly and harmfully baby hands used executive action), and while Biden returned wall money taken from the DoD, the rest of the wall money was explicitly designated by Congress for building the border wall in 2019 and Congress will not cancel that legislative order(wall funds), despite Biden asking Congress to cancel the 2019 wall funds law since arriving in office in 2020.

This post is misleading, the money is being legally used for a legislatively required purpose and any federal laws are being broken legislatively by Congress as a result of baby hands in 2019, not the Biden administration.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Cool. The talking points are out.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

I know, this thread was crazy without any real answers. At least now there's legislative and executive record out there.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, now there's excuses for waiving 26 laws in order to enforce one of Trump's laws. Hooray.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Just one excuse, the law that Congress won't repeal since they're down with the wall, but yea.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Well, as long as you're honest that you're making excuses.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

As far as "excuses" go, respecting the Constitution and the legislative process are pretty good ones.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Well, at least you were accidentally honest about making excuses until I pointed it out.

You got the wall you and Biden wanted. Congratulations on all the dead ocelots.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

I was quite deliberately honest.

Biden actively campaigned against the baby hands wall to Congress, who decided to uphold the 2019 law baby hands created.

You can thank the last administration for the ocelots.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Which executive branch waived 26 laws to enforce 1?

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

The diaper administration active in 2019, thank you for asking!

[-] Retrograde@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Spoken like a true John Oliver, bravo and agreed

[-] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, my main concern regarding the border wall no matter who is trying to build it, is the destruction of protected wildlife refuge and habitat, being that I'm an environmental conservationist. It pains me to hear about wild-lands and woodlands being clear-cut in the name of greed or something that doesn't make much sense.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I live not too far from the section of wall Biden is gonna build for Trump. I worry about the ocelots.

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
448 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32341 readers
347 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS