535
Support for Third U.S. Political Party Up to 63%
(news.gallup.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
535 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19126 readers
1982 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
if they were aligned with another candidate, they wouldn't be in a so-called third party.
stein wasn't a spoiler. the whole narrative of spoiler candidates presumes that republicans or democrats own votes but they don't. voters own votes, and tehy get to decide who they want to give them to. it's not as though democrats don't know what it is that green party voters want, they just don't care if they get green party voters to switch.
Reality is, if you vote green you’re giving Republicans +1. You either know your candidate won’t win, or aren’t smart enough to understand probability. Regardless the outcome is the same no matter what excuse you give.
Eh...
Lots of people who voted 3rd party wouldn't vote for either of the top 2 parties.
I 100% agree it's the same as not voting for that race. But I wouldn't go as far as to say it's essentially a vote for a party.
false dichotomy
Give me a third possibility
i don't know whether my candidate will win (JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER VOTER), and i understand probability
no, they're not.
where did you buy your crystal ball, and do they make them in black?
if I vote green I'm voting against republicans.
Only Symbolically. In reality your splitting the vote among broadest like minded individuals which gives the advantage to the opposition. You don’t have to like it, but that’s the consequence.
if others were like-minded they'd be voting for my candidate. if they're concerned about vote splitting, they should vote with the people they know will not compromise and vote for someone THEY don't want to win.
You don’t have to like it
Yes, 99% of voters should conform to you. Not the other way around.
if you have 99% of voters, you don't need me. let me vote for who i want to win.
Depends on the election. I’m not asking you to do anything. I’m telling you you’re helping accomplish the opposite of what you want versus something close to what you want.
impossible: what i want is for fascist to get out of office, not for a less-fascist politician to win. that's why i'm planning to vote green again.
False. It's like youre ignoring the post article. 63% is more than enough to start voting third party
63% of people say they want another option, not 63% of people want the same other option. At best you could have the Republican Party split, but they know that means losing everywhere so they won’t actually do it.
The Libertarian party splits the Republican party far more than the greens split the Dems. We need to promote more parties so they split the vote of both parties.
it's definitively NOT demonstrably false: you can't prove a counterfactual, so you can't prove what would have happened if stein wasn't on the ballot.
so what? hilary garnered more votes than trumps margin of victory over stein. was hilary a spoiler?
if trump pulled more registered democrat votes in those states, would he be his own spoiler?
where does it end?
even raising the russophobic smear campaign in any way other than to condemn it is fucking gross.
the infamous photo is just a smear. the explanation is innocent.
it was the RT 10th anniversary dinner, and RT is a major news outlet who has let her spread her message. it's no more complicated than that.
she didn't know he'd be there. she didn't make the seating arrangements. all the insinuation is fucking gross and you should apologize to her.
I hope she sees this.
no, it's worse: from the seat of the presidency he legitimized putin. all stein did is buy a ticket to a dinner and get stuck with a shitty tablemate.
In a practical sense the major parties do own the votes.
come and take it
What?
He ran in Dem primaries so he wouldn't be a spoiler in the general...
That's a good thing for the Dem party.
And how does him running in the general "screwing over democrats"?
He's literally always congresses with the Dems, the only difference is the letter by his name.
Why would he intentionally shoot his own campaign in the face? This makes no sense.
perot wasn't a spoiler. analysis found that he hurt clinton's margin of victory.