177
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
177 points (100.0% liked)
Games
16722 readers
473 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"Their hardest" literally a hobby most likely not their hardest and it is a job for the paralympians, so not an analogy on both fronts, "nothing of importance" having a job to buy food and stay alive is more important than a videogame mod. Fake everything and you get an analogy, congrats.
Exactly, literally a hobby and not a job, people contributing time they absolutely don't need to in order to create something for others to enjoy.
And you're criticising them because they're taking too long. Taking too long with their unpaid voluntary work for a product lots of people will enjoy.
Seeing it yet? :) x
Nooo its a hobby u cant type LMAO or I'll compare you to disrespecting paralympians ๐๐๐๐ I literally predicted u would reduce both events to criticism, now I bothered to explain it too
Seeing it yet? :) x
It's not simple criticism though is it mate? It's criticising people who are contributing to the world while offering nothing yourself. That's the whole point which has already been pretty clearly explained.
If we take it back to your original comment you're literally criticising the amount of free work someone chooses to do. I'd hoped you might see the analogy but it seems like we're past that point so let's call it a day.
Good luck though mate, maybe think about it a bit more when you don't feel like it's a battle with an anonymous Internet person and can look more objectively at the points made :) x