132

Senate Republicans are predicting that Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) will need to reach out to House Democrats to get the votes to prevent a government shutdown at the end of next week.

GOP senators don’t think McCarthy will be able to unify his entire GOP conference behind any measure to prevent an Oct. 1 shutdown and will have to rely on Democrats to keep federal departments and agencies open.

But they predict the Speaker won’t reach out across the aisle until the last possible moment to avoid a backlash from House conservatives, who are threatening to offer a motion to essentially dump him as Speaker if he does not hew to their demands for major spending cuts.

The reality, they say, is that the only spending measure that can pass both the Senate and House is one that has bipartisan support.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] snipgan@kbin.social 50 points 1 year ago

Already failed the DoD vote, so he's running out of options.

If he does go to the Democrats, he's screwed. If he doesn't he is still screwed.

Dude wanted this job too.....hahahahahaha!

[-] books@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

It's funny. The last two gop speakers quit because trying to manage these goof balls is like pulling hairs off your nutsack.

McCarthy thought he could do it better than actual politically savy people..

He's a buffoon.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

McCarthy thought he could do it better than actual politically savy people

I don’t know about that. I think he just wanted the job on his resume. A book deal or a job with a lobbying firm pays more to a former Speaker of the House than it does to some congressman from Bakersfield.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I mean, sure. But it also helps if you were an effective speaker.

Any lobbying firm hiring this speaker, who can't keep the house's business flowing, won't be able to do shit when he isn't speaker either.

[-] books@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Probably some truth to that, but also had an embarrassing nomination process, and had to give away way too much power.

Like, it's an impressive resume booster if you are a successful speaker of the house, or if you have enough sense to bow out at a reasonable time... but who gives a shit what is on his resume when the first thing you get when you google Kevin Mcarthy is the fact that he let one person write his death warrant as speaker, or the fact that he had 15 votes to get the gavel in the first place.

I legitimately think that he believes he was more political savy than someone like Paul Ryan, and I don't believe anyone in their right mind would agree with that.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

You got it all wrong, he didn't want to do the job, he just wanted the title

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You have to be stupid to try to herd modern Republicans.

Their mindset in every interaction is to tell you to go fuck yourself and work against you. It's why they can bitch and whine all day, but find governance to be a wholly foreign concept and appear surprised and confused when they catch that "in charge" car they've been chasing, and proceed to blame their out of power opposition when the wheels come off.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
132 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3984 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS