380
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] casmael@lemm.ee 76 points 2 years ago

Didn’t it turn out MJ wasn’t actually a sex pest 🤔 ?

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 106 points 2 years ago

Yeah. The kids came out later and talked about how their parents pressured them into making shit up. Iirc they said he was a weird guy, but he never touched them inappropriately. It was too late at that point though. People had already made up their minds and the response was generally, "well, but I'm sure he has. Just 'cause they weren't molested doesn't mean he didn't molest other kids. He seems like a kid molester."

[-] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 64 points 2 years ago

In the court of public vibe check he was guilty regardless of what actually happened. Poor dude's life was tragic. I'm not normally one to feel a whole lot of sympathy for the mega rich, but MJ was a good one.

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 41 points 2 years ago

Yeah. From what I've heard his brain was either kinda stuck in "child mode" or it easily reverted to it due to the trauma and abuse he received growing up. He could act like an adult if he had to, but he was a child pretending to be an adult so to speak. A lot of his life was the result of trying to experience a childhood he didn't get to have as a result of being in the Jackson 5.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

He did bring a llama to a studio session with Freddie Mercury though.

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

And then there was the time he rented a whole grocery store so he could have the experience of shopping for groceries. Ordinarily it seems like a fucked up entitled billionaire conspicuous consumption thing to do. But MJ gets a pass in my book.

[-] drbluefall@toast.ooo 23 points 2 years ago

Honestly, if I was never really able to experience the life of a normal person, and craved that experience for even a moment, I'd probably be willing to drop a lot of money too.

[-] dandroid@dandroid.app 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think it helps that he wasn't mega rich from his own wishes. His dad forced him to perform until he got mega rich.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Not all of his accusers recanted, and his personal computer had a ton of cp on it. That detail was excluded from trial for being prejudicial, and thus didn't make headlines at the time.

So yeah, there were probably some parents who sold their kids, and other parents who coached their kids to inflate their accusations, and some kids who got molested. It's likely some of the accusations weren't true, but it's also entirely unlikely that he was completely innocent.

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 29 points 2 years ago

I looked into this and what I found waaaass:

A) the prosecution's case was leakier than a screen door on a submarine. Most of the witnesses had prior grievances against Jackson, had sold stories to tabloids instead of the police, claimed to be in impossible situations (for an example, Star Arvizo claimed to have been shown pornography that hadn't been published until after the accusations; Janet Arvizo claimed to have been held hostage, but receipts showed she'd spent $7,000 shopping and dining out during that time), or straight up went against the prosecution and claimed the prosecution was lying.

B) the defense had hundreds of people (staff, celebrities, friends, visitors) who'd either spent time at Neverland Ranch with Jackson and/or knew him outside of the ranch, all of whom were ready to testify that they'd never witnessed any wrongdoing on Jackson's part (though several staff members had said Star and Gavin Arvizo were horrible children, one of the staff members in particular had been threatened with a knife). Additionally, several celebrities acted as witnesses specifically against the prosecution, such as George Lopez and Jay Leno, alleging that the claimants had previously attempted to extort them for money and that they had tried to warn Jackson about the Arvizo family.

C) on the case of the child pornography. There was none. The FBI raided his house and supposedly found normal pornography, but no child pornography. However, the media claimed it was child pornography (so you're wrong about it not making headlines). Additionally, the FBI had already been monitoring him since 1992 due to creditable death threats being made against him, and during over 10yrs of monitoring, they'd never once found any evidence of wrongdoing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse_accusations_against_Michael_Jackson https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Michael_Jackson https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI_files_on_Michael_Jackson

[-] Pinklink@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Holy shit did it? You got a link to news or something on this?

I really don't know and haven't followed any of it very closely. But his music is top shelf.

[-] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I would like to think that he wasn't, but it's undeniable that either way it was creepy what he was doing.

[-] Fogle@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

It made sense to me when someone said everything he did was because he was basically robbed of childhood and made to perform for a living since he was like 7

[-] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's what my dad said.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
380 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

15788 readers
1756 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS