1734
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Ok, but - and please don't think I mean this in an offensive way, I am asking this in the most naive way - isn't that your whole job? I get that it is annoying, but you don't waste 30 hours, you just work 30 hours. Hours that you get paid for and hours that you would use to do the same job/try to hire for another position otherwise. Of course you could get more done (i.e. more people hired) in a unit of time, but at the end of the day that's not your problem really, is it? You did everything correctly. You still get your hours paid.

[-] cjthomp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"hires for" doesn't just mean "in-house recruiter"

Hiring is probably not their only responsibility

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
1734 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

10006 readers
60 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS