694
submitted 1 year ago by cowpowered@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheAlbatross 269 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll believe the economics are better when I'm not paying markedly more for everything in my life and my salary increases.

The politicians are so wildly out of touch with the citizens.

This idea that the data is "mistrusted" or "unseen" is ridiculous to the point of incredulity. I don't care what the data says, I know what my lived experiences are and everything is getting wildly more expensive except my labor, it seems. Show me any study you want, it won't change that groceries are 30%+ more expensive, my rent keeps going up, restaurants and bars have gotten nearly 50% or more pricier and my wage hasn't grown to match.

[-] tasty4skin@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

The economy is doing better precisely because regular people’s lives are harder. A “strong” economy means more and more off the backs of everyday laborers. Not to mention intentional raising of unemployment rates to combat inflation. The system is fucked. There’s nothing in it for me and you.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

Exactly this. Companies do better when they can exploit their workers for as much value as possible. That’s what a “good economy” looks like and it is the duty of every living human to hurt it.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I can see all my grocery store receipts in my app up to two years ago.

Many things have gotten a lot more expensive, but some things haven't. I would put it at 20%, not 30+%.

Also, my mortgage didn't go up. Renters are getting screwed, that's for sure.

Finally, my wage definitely went up. Although many people did not have had their wages go up and they are getting screwed too

So I'm doing much better than two years ago.

The economy isn't bad for everyone.

But for many people, it's definitely bad.

To say that the numbers are wrong is a stretch though. The numbers just reflect averages.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I too have largely been doing better since the pandemic than before it. But I also bought a condo during the extremely brief price dip in early 2020.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SCB@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

This idea that the data is “mistrusted” or “unseen” is ridiculous to the point of incredulity. I don’t care what the data says

Cannot believe you wrote this without a trace of irony.

[-] TheAlbatross 18 points 1 year ago

Buddy they can say the economy is better until the cows come home, it doesn't change that for a huge swath of people, it fucking ain't, it's far worse.

[-] archiotterpup@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You could say it's not trickling down. It's more like an inverted pyramid scheme.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Individual impacts are always felt last. In 08, the average person didn't experience the crisis until it had been underway for about half a year or more.

I am not arguing that every person is literally better off this moment but rather that economic messaging as a whole is not resonating with people.

Wages are going up. Hiring is through the roof. Things are turned around. Fundamentals are all rock solid, and even the Fed is saying that they will be easing off as they have essentially already achieved the "soft landing" with inflation.

The person I replied to is committing the same logical "sin" that the article bemoans.

[-] 1847953620@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's almost as if when the average person talks about the economy, they're talking about metrics and dynamics that affect them, and when politicians talk about economics, they talk about a set of metrics and dynamics that the average person couldn't give a flying fuck about, which may or may not affect them eventually. The degree to which those two sets are related is constantly in dispute, but trying to confuse the economy for the 1% as the economy for everyone else is kind of a fundamental deception that people are getting tired of. There's no guarantee or even strong reason to believe any of our schools of thought of macroeconomics have ever been right. We're making it up as we go along, and often times for the benefit of the upper class, not everyone else.

[-] Mudface@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is called “propaganda” say it with me “prop-a-Ganda”

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
694 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3402 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS