728
submitted 1 year ago by MooseBoys@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MonsieurHedge@kbin.social 221 points 1 year ago

People who think being a jackass is a form of activism. That's all you really need to know.

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 95 points 1 year ago

Uh hello, it's called jacktivism.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago

Oh right! I thought that was... uhhh ... something else

[-] serpentofnumbers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago

you're thinking of jackitvision

[-] wheresmypillow@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

Is that the one that makes you go blind?

[-] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I think it’s the name of Jack Black’s twitch channel.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have seen so many thread saying how bad that instance is but every time I ask for links proving how bad they are I have never see anything worth the hate.

Can you provide some examples?

[-] MonsieurHedge@kbin.social 96 points 1 year ago

I have never see anything worth the hate.

You just have a very high tolerance for jackassery. You've seen plenty of evidence of hexbear hostility, i.e. the "dunk tank" that would justify not wanting to interact with hexbear users and have actively chosen to disregard it.

This is because you're kind of a jackass. Disregarding people engaging in good faith with "just trust me bro" is exactly the kind of thing people really hate hexbear users for. Not because of illegal activity or moral failing, but because they're assholes. While you may think this isn't worth de-federation, unfortunately moderators aren't some kind of legal authority, and if federating with hexbear means instance admins or community moderators need to put in triple the work to prune all the arguments and """shitposting""" hexbear users love, nobody is legally or morally required to put up with it.

It's legitimately that simple. Hexbear users are jerks and nobody wants to hang out with them, and that's enough to ban them from any given community or instance.

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago
[-] Gormadt 30 points 1 year ago

For anyone curious:

Source for the thread where that image comes from.

The whole thread is pretty eye opening to be honest. Especially the top comment.

[-] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

They’re tankies. End of story.

This is not a good argument, which is going to elicit the response he had no matter the context.

People don't put the effort into showing receipts. And sometimes the receipts are about murders that happened over 100 years ago? This post about the tzars https://kbin.social/m/meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works/t/424265/Hexbearians-frustrated-that-user-draws-the-line-at-child-murder

This whole thread is about the historical context around the summary execution of the romanovs. While the tzars absolutely needed to end, in the context of the 1910s and absolute monarchy, if the children didn't die there would have likely been civil war trying to reinstate the line into power.

THIS https://kbin.social/m/meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works/t/419779/This-Comm-is-Racist-Thought-Terminating-Nonsense

Is a much better receipt. User doesn't understand the winnie the pooh reference, also doesn't understand the PRCs effort to stifle discussion about TSM and the pressure that firsthand witnesses are under.

even with this guy, I don't understand how a user being an idiot is worth defederating. If he's going into other threads and spouting the same nonsense, sure ban him. If many people are going into other unrelated threads and injecting that kind of misinformation into conversation, that's a pattern that makes defederating a consideration.

Is there this pattern, of other communities being disrupted in this way?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Best point I've read made here.

I'm also probably kind if a jackass, because hex bear doesn't bother me. Would I appreciate a civil conversation to better understand their POV? Totally. Will that happen? No. So I just don't interact. The fierce protection of LGBTQ communities is something I appreciate however.

[-] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

The fierce protection of LGBTQ communities is something I appreciate however.

It's not really genuine though. They lightly elevate trump above all other presidents despite his history of attacking LGBTQ rights: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2020/09/trumps-record-lgbtq-rights-vile-moment-took-office-kept-list/

It's just a political angle to get support from people who feel isolated away from other political movements.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Lol what, who on hexbear is elevating trump, this is a hilarious take.

Also just gonna leave this here https://observer.com/2016/10/wikileaks-reveals-dnc-elevated-trump-to-help-clinton/

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here FaeDrifter is again saying this shit.

A HUGE PORTION OF HEXBEAR IS TRANS. OVER HALF THE MODS ARE TRANS. THIS HAS BEEN THE CASE FOR THREE YEARS PRIOR TO FEDERATION. FAE, PEOPLE HAVE POINTED THIS OUT TO YOU BEFORE. PROBABLY MULTIPLE TIMES NOW.

See @HornyOnMain@lemmy.ml in this very thread:

https://lemmy.ml/comment/3504748

We've never "pretended to support lgbt", why would we? What would be the point of a load of alt right channers roleplaying as queer communists for years on an incredibly niche social media in the hope that eventually redditors would come to the site? And even supposing we did, and we were all just alt right types, if we'd spent years doing reading groups of queer theory together and kicking out transphobes and creating the most queer friendly space on lemmy just as an incredibly long extended bit then would the supposed communists we're impersonating even take issue with that?

Like just use some critical thinking, at this point almost half of the sites users are trans and most of the rest are queer, most new users cite our radical opposition to queerphobia as their reason for joining, what evidence is there that we lie about being queer friendly? Like just check out !traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns@hexbear.net or !anti_cishet_aktion@hexbear.net or !transenby_liberation@hexbear.net and tell me in good faith that all these people have been lying for years about being queer

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 71 points 1 year ago

Lol, that's because the mods of said threads already had to delete all the bullshit they posted once they "accidentally found this on all" and then descent on it like locusts (but they're totally not brigading!!!1!)

Here's one of their mods:

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] audiomodder 58 points 1 year ago

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/1854795

How about flooding a meta thread that’s not on their own instance to insult people who disagree with them?

Part of the drama with that incident included hexbear folks straight up saying “I thought the whole point of federating with other instances was so that we could dunk on liberals”. Majority of folks on hexbear did not see any issues with the behavior of their members on this post.

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Oh wow, there's more hexbear comments than blahaj comments. Almost every blahaj comment has like 3-4 responses. I read a comment of someone saying that the thread looks wildly different if you see it from an instance that defederated them, and it's so sad that it is completely different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GnothiSeauton@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

If you'd like examples I know some of their bad takes are starting to be posted to !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

I have been there and not seen anything worth banning an instance.

Can you give a direct link to somersaulting you think should result in de-federation?

[-] hypelightfly@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago
[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Any account I don't agree with is a saeloin. Got it.

Someone provided what I was asking for and I changed my stance in a reply 10 minutes before you commented.

See my reply to @SkyezOpen in this thread.

Thank you.

Finally something ban worthy.

I agree completely that any instance that hosts that type of content should be de-federated.

Now, I am sure you will retract your accusation...

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] GnothiSeauton@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

You may have me confused with someone else. I didn't say anything about defederation or banning instances.

What in your opinion is behavior or views that is worthy of defederation? There appears to be many different standards for that from what I've seen.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

They're tankies. End of story.

[-] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

Just throwing out the word tankie is pretty much meaningless at this point. It might as well be “woke”. If you have specific issues explain that rather than just trying to shut down a conversation with a word. Some users might be a bit too sympathetic too China but I’ve typically seen them more come from a reasonable non US propaganda viewpoint and have been open to actual criticism about China. Some of it can seem like whataboutism but to be fair a lot of the complaints I see about China are shit the US does as well so it can be a fair point.

[-] MonsieurHedge@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

In terms of the "tankie problem", it's mostly supporting Russian aggression in Ukraine pretty much solely to "own the libs" and "get back at the evil NATO". Most "tankies", a term that has become effectively meaningless from overuse, are more accurately political contrarians who care less about things getting better for more people and more about Owning The Libs.

There's honestly a good chunk of them on most fediverse instances just due to the general community vibe, with Hexbear having more than, say, lemmy.world, but less than lemmygrad. Hexbear stands out moreso to being the successor to Chapo Trap House, a community notorious for being so utterly vile to interact with that nobody wants anything to do with them.

[-] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I appreciate you actually explaining your position behind the use of the word. I have a lot of issues with NATO and some with Ukraine but I agree that Russia is the aggressor in this situation. I have noticed that some of their users are pro-Russia but most of what I’ve seen is more anti-NATO which I can understand. As I said in another comment I definitely see some of the users troll more than I agree with and I personally prefer to deal with things in a different manner but overall I’m fine with being federated with them.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Do your think Ukraine and NATO are above reproach?

[-] MonsieurHedge@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

No, but they're absolutely the lesser of two evils here. I'm generally not sure how people justify a war of territorial expansion to stroke the ego of a geriatric dictator in Ukraine, then turn around and get angry about a war of territorial expansion to stroke the ego of a geriatric dictator in, say, Afghanistan.

It's hypocrisy. You dronestrike a children's hospital in Kabul and everyone acknowledges the evil of it, but Russia dronestrikes a children's hospital in Ukraine and suddenly it's justified as "retaliating against western imperialism". Sure, and Iran had nukes Uncle Sam needed to find, too.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Lesser of two evils? Please. How old do you think I am, ten? I’m not at all sure they’re the lesser of two evils, but then I’m pretty critical of things like imf, World Bank, allying with Saudi Arabia “ccp bad” garbage. Humans are animals and I’m here to learn and the western narrative is rather sanitized so no thanks.

[-] MonsieurHedge@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

You are a political contrarian if you think invading a sovereign nation is justified by "the western narrative is rather sanitized". You don't care about people's lives or welfare, you care about Being Special and Being Better Than Other People.

To be blunt, you disgust me with your callous disregard for the lives of innocents solely to be cool and edgy on the internet.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Nah, you’re just trying to bully me to agree with you, with zero sense of irony in a thread ostensibly about the same behavior; unless that’s not why you’re upset with that behavior, per se.

[-] MonsieurHedge@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

I don't particularly care if you agree with me or not. What I find interesting is that what motivates your political positions are effectively identical to, say, an American christofascist. Disdain for the mainstream media, performative cynicism, conspiratorial thinking. If it goes counter to The Mainstream, it must be good. The idea that people may be harmed by your position doesn't matter to you at all. People """are animals""", after all, and they matter to you only as props in your self-aggrandizing personal narrative.

I'm genuinely not sure how you're intending to sell your position of "Empathy is for losers, the only thing that matters is Being Right On The Internet" as anything other than repulsive, or how you're not demonstrating why people dislike hexbear users (i.e. spitting on the concept of basic human empathy due to political contrarianism).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Well apparently Kbin has some political contrarians too, who'd have thought.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Contrarian? Hardly. I’m just aware that Western Europe and the USA have their own agendas, engage in propagandizing their own citizens, to greater or lesser extent. Pretending otherwise is disingenuous. Notice how lacked the behavior, not the person, without knowing more? Try out sometime.

[-] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

So trying to frame this as "which is worse" is just a bad argument.

Put some effort into proving your position.

You also seem pretty condescending, why should people respect you if you don't respect them?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Again. Trust me bro.

That is not evidence.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Literally scrolled for 10 seconds and hey genocide denial. https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/c9fc2504-6828-4d30-ad4a-9224e2a2e58f.png

Not to mention unironic Russia shilling. When I called out a mod he responded with "oh yeah well America worked with nazis."

Cool. That's bad too. They're contrarian to the point of parody. Literally any wrong by China Russia or north Korea is justified by "well America did the same thing" as if leftists as a whole aren't already on board with that thing being bad, but it still doesn't excuse that bad thing now.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Thank you.

Finally something ban worthy.

I agree completely that any instance that hosts that type of content should be de-federated.

[-] charliespider@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I don't know personally, but a commenter above wrote:

I appreciate that they help stomp out fascist, racist, and anti-trans rhetoric on Lemmy.

So if there's any truth in that, the backlash could be a bunch of whiney butthurt Nazis.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Again: can I please have a link to show why they are bad.

Otherwise it is just: Trust me Bro

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I went to a link below and honestly, as another commenter succinctly summarized as “whiny butthurt Nazis” was a giant “freedom” murica style. Seriously, my eyes hurt, I left.

[-] MrJukes@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

I haven't really had any issues with them. That said, literally the thread above this one in all top hour has a bunch of people hoping Biden gets COVID and dies...so there is that.

https://hexbear.net/post/515198

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Meh. I have seen the same said about Musk, Trump and others.

While I don't agree with that being said about anyone, I think it is still up to a person to decide if they want to block hexbear.

[-] MrJukes@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

For sure, I'm not advocating blocking or defederating at all. But you asked for examples of hexbear being unsavory and I provided one. That is all. It would be more of an accumulation instead of one singular instance that might push some over the edge.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
728 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45751 readers
957 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS