326

submitted 1 year ago by xxxSexMan69xxx to c/196

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

There is the tiniest, infinitesimal amount of value in the statement that, likely because of the way we’re all graded in school, we don’t really use the full range of a 1-10 scale for attractiveness, and are sorta only really saying ugly, mediocre, attractive, or model.

There is zero value in saying that that’s an issue and the solution is a psychopathic and dehumanizing system.

[-] xxxSexMan69xxx 8 points 1 year ago

When it comes to looks, the only meaningful scale consist of a 0 (not attractive) and 1 (attractive). E.g., if a woman I am talking to doesn't find me attractive, there is zero practical difference between me looking like Chris Hemsworth or an ogre.