54
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Blake@feddit.uk 106 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Clearly everyone should just let China do whatever they want to avoid war, if we appease them by expanding their territorial claims and avoiding conflict then surely everything will be fine. The politics of appeasement has historically been very successful.

Edit: Stop replying please, I don’t want to waste any more time arguing with y’all.

[-] ensignrick@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] TomHardy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

These are the territorial claims of the government on Taiwan, from a state the US and much of the Western world support or at least de facto like to defend in Asia. They never made any remarks regarding Taiwan's claims with 18 other countries. If the US supports peace in the Asia Pacific (besides looking at a map and asking why the US has even a say about Asia in the first place), then surely Mainland China must be supported, as by protecting & legitimizing Taiwan's constitution, you're approving this shit in Asia.

But let me guess, neoliberal countries get a pass from the crackerverse?

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 24 points 1 year ago

Holy shit, you’re telling me that both sides in a civil war think they should have full control of the country they’re in a civil war over? Hang on I need to sit fucking down my head is spinning

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Civil war is when two sides of a nonviolent conflict peacefully negotiate reintegration.

Better send weapons to Taiwan!

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago

Here’s a question for you: would you support a Chinese military invasion of Taiwan?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

No, but if it weren't for Western provocations that would never have been on the table. What do you think giving weapons to Taiwan does? China will not tolerate an arms buildup in Taiwain, it will attack as a result. That's not good and I don't support it, but that's the material reality that you refuse to accept.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago

If the Taiwanese state would never capitulate and reintegrate peacefully with the CCP state, which is their claim, then wouldn’t that make an invasion of Taiwan inevitable, regardless of weapons?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Never is a long time and, with the right incentives, that stance can be changed peacefully.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

Assume that it wouldn’t, though - I could just as easily say “with the right incentives, the United States could elect a communist president and transition to a people’s republic”, so let’s take them at their word that never means never and go from there, shall we?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay, then China could peacefully try and fail for a million billion years. That still doesn't actually necessitate invasion.

But also that assumption is kinda nonsense so I think it can be safely discarded. Forever is a long time.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago

You’re not engaging with my argument because you know fine well what the outcome would be. I think we’re done here.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I definitely answered your hypothetical? If the Taiwanese state would never capitulate and reintegrate peacefully with the rest of China, then China could peacefully try and fail to reintegrate for a million billion years. That's it. Nothing else has to happen.

I think your argument is dumb, but that definitely addresses it.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

Oh, my apologies, you’re quite right, I initially misread your message, sorry about that - thank you for your answer and I appreciate your consistency. I appreciate you arguing in good faith and I understand your position.

I disagree with you, I think you have an altogether a bit too optimistic perspective of the CCP, but I understand why you would be inclined to feel that way.

My point is, I think it’s pretty clear that Taiwan stands no chance whatsoever in a hot conflict with the Red Army - I hope that’s something that we agree on. I am sure that Taiwan is also very aware of that fact.

So what threat is posed by providing conventional munitions to Taiwan? If they were used in aggression, they would guarantee their own demise. Do you really think that they would be so desperate to strike a meaningless blow against the CCP that they would trade everything to accomplish that?

If so, why would these weapons change anything? They could have sacrificed everything for a single meaningless act of violence long before now. It’s not like Taiwan is being supplied with nuclear weapons, is it?

Providing Taiwan with conventional weaponry only accomplishes one thing: making an invasion of Taiwan less compelling.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Taiwan stands no chance right now, but how many billions of dollars in weapons would it take to change that calculus? Ukraine is fighting off Russia despite being in a much worse position because of the endless funnel of weaponry from the West, so it seems that if Taiwan can dig itself in and arm itself to the teeth it can become a legitimate threat. China will be forced to deal with having a hostile enemy as a neighbor, and even if Taiwan didn't openly invade they could still become a serious regional threat to China and Chinese interests.

Think about the Korean peninsula for what the future might hold.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

A threat to CCP interests it may be, but that wouldn’t justify a military invasion that would kill a shitload of people, would it? It would have to be sinking food or medicine shipments with coastal guns or something equally abhorrent to justify such an act. And again, that would absolutely be valid justification for an invasion, so they wouldn’t do it. How can you claim to be one of the good guys when you justify a military invasion and the deaths of thousands of innocents as “just a fact of how things will turn out”.

[-] TomHardy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

No, I think you need to read my comment and your's again. You say appeasement politics will lead to no good, so... you protect the ROC's claims instead, which is even appeasing more that just leaving China. I caught your illogical argument, and distilled it to the meaningless content that it was. Now you pretend stupid to run away from that illogical claim. But you can't win against me, who studied at Oxford, Nato boy

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 16 points 1 year ago

you can’t win against me, who studied at Oxford, Nato boy

This is the most unbelievably embarrassing thing I have ever read on Lemmy. Honestly, if you regret writing this, please let me know. I will amend my comment to erase the fact you ever wrote it.

you protect the ROC’s claims

Please cite evidence of my support of Taiwan’s territorial claims. If you believe that opposing CCP imperialism means that one must also support Taiwanese territorial claims then you have made an incorrect assumption - and a converse error on your part does not constitute a failure on mine.

I’m very sorry that I refuse to defend the strawman you so thoughtfully prepared for me. By all means, whack away at him. I would suggest that you take your own advice, by the way, and read my actual comment and respond to the text of what I wrote, not some imagined subtext your Oxford-educated brain conjured to allay your cognitive dissonance. Oh, and one last thing - whatever your parents paid for that education, unfortunately it would appear to have turned out a poor investment.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Holy fucking cringe, if I was the CCP propaganda office I would want my money back.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

What actions have they taken in pursuit of these supposed claims?

[-] TomHardy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Well, if they are so democratic, and support other nations sovereignty as they would like their own, why don't they remove them from their constitution? I have a feeling you have no idea of the ideology of the state on that island.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

So no actions needing attention like we're giving to China for threatening the sovereignty of other independent nations.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Oh geez. This thread is great. Thanks for the laugh! 😂

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

The only territorial claims China has tried to enforce recently are to literally uninhabited lands (Aksai Chin and the SCS islands) and Taiwan (which they are still at war with).

How much do you really care about a piece of rock with no people and no animals living on it?

[-] blazera@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Damn Taiwan is a piece of rock with no people on it?

[-] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

So the CCP is full of idiots that are willing to weaken their international relations for a bunch of useless pieces of rock? Is that what you are saying?

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Can you explain to the crowd how you felt comfortable enough to pretend that the country of Taiwan is a barren rock without any people living on it?

Inquiring minds want to know.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
54 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32321 readers
589 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS