The fight against unjust laws requires militant protests, and the fight against bigotry needs to be relentlessly aggressive. It is a privilege to believe self-defense cannot be used to counter fascism in its early stages.

In the liberal mindset, violence should have been used only when Jews were lined up to enter the gas chambers.

Once Jews became political targets, violence should have been the first step. After the Nazis declared Jews enemies, they had the right to defend themselves with violence. A violent approach at the beginning could have prevented the rise of the Nazi party.

Liberals' inability to grasp this will lead to more marginalized minorities dying around the world.

Militant protests should be organized against the removal of women's abortion rights in the USA. The rights of black people and LGBT rights should also be protected by force.

The protests should be held in front of, if not inside, the houses of republicans.

These protests should be as aggressive as possible, creating an atmosphere of fear among those who oppose the rights of women and others. There should eventually be a tipping point when their fear becomes reality, if they are not to stop their unnecessary oppression.

A marginalized group does not receive human rights, they are stripped of them. The removal of your birthrights should be violently opposed as soon as possible.

Fascists use democracy to their advantage. It does not matter whether they are politicians or citizens, a right-wing politician will oppress both with his political power. Our ability to stop fascism will be limited if liberals do not exercise their political authority.

It is too frightening for liberal politicians to use their power for real moral purposes, so they won't help.

Our politicians accept racism as an opinion and fascism as a solution.

People are imprisoned for petty crimes, but you can speak freely if you make a sincere effort to recruit people to your fascist ideology. Creating a safe environment for fascists to speak without fear is not only dangerous, but those who allow it are complicit in their crimes.

If a racist or homophobic person gets into a room with a fascist. Within a few hours, if they discussed politics, two fascists came out of the room.

To prevent fascism, liberal voters must take risks, including letting go of their flawed concept of democracy. Unless they engage in militant protests or suppress bigots freedom of speech, liberals and fascists are the same.

The right to say racist remarks only protects those who intend to use racist language. The same applies to all bigoted speech.

In a society where freedom of speech is unlimited, only fascists would benefit.

*Initially, they came for racists' freedom of speech.

After that, they remove homophobic speech.

Afterwards, they demanded removal for sexist speech.

When they came for me I gave them a high five and said thank you.

Because I am not a racist, homophobic or sexist person. *

It is always necessary to respond aggressively to the claim that bigotry is merely a difference of opinion.

The methods used by marginalized groups should be more aggressive. The fight against racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia and transphobia should extend beyond shaming bigots.

When an oppressed minority kills a fascist, it always does so in self-defense. Killing fascists is a way to defend ourselves from their ideology that hates us and seeks to oppress us. Instead of asking whether fascists should be slaughtered, we should ask whether they deserve to suffer on their way to the slaughterhouse.