1183
Tesla founders (i.imgur.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

This post is absolutely stupid, but keeps getting reposted because people have a hate boner for Elon Musk.

Tesla started in July 2003, Elon invested $6.5 Million in February 2004. That makes him a co-founder. Their first electric car was released in 2008 with Elon as CEO.(1)

You don't get a startup to the seventh most valuable company by being lazy or lucky.(2)

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 47 points 1 year ago

Wow, if only we had a name for someone that invests in a company after it is founded.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We do. Principal investors are often listed as cofounders in startups, if they take a significant role in company operations from early in the company lifespan

https://foundersnetwork.com/blog/founder-vs-cofounder/

Cofounder isn't a title. It's a role.

I know this gets in the way of easy dunking, but reality is often disappointing.

[-] relative_iterator@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

The status of “founder” or “co-founder” denotes a historical fact about who was responsible for creating the business. As such, these are permanent titles that can’t be revoked later on.

Titles. From your own article 😂

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes and if you read the article, you learn why someone could be made co-founder by actually getting the business moving.

If I start a business today, I don't actually have to do anything except pay for a business license, and a co-founder could be the person who helps me get it off the ground.

This isn't some obscure "gotcha" thing. There's a reason he won his decision. Do you not realize you're literally arguing against reality?

It's weird as fuck because you could not manufacture a target as easy to make fun of as Musk, except possibly Trump himself. There's already plenty, so you don't need to make up new shit.

Everything the dude has done in like the last 5 years is just prime meme material, so idk why people keep reaching for this nonsensical shit.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 15 points 1 year ago

Capital always pretends its role is innovative when it is just exploitative.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every claim in this sentence is false.

Consider not using strong language like "always." A bank giving you a business loan does not claim to be innovative, and is not exploiting you.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

You can stop telling people you don't know what you're talking about now, everyone gets the point.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm one of few people that are both talking sense and bringing receipts.

Sorry the real world isn't the world crafted for you by memes.

[-] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Great job not responding to his points but instead needlessly taking jabs.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Wrestle with a pig and you just both end up covered in shit...

Mentioning a pig smells like shit as continue walking past, and you wont get any shit on you.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The libs are mad, because they're confused, as usual, and don't know what community they're in.

I appreciate the information provided but It’s basically an honorary title that can be purchased. If you’re in the business world maybe that title holds some water but for common language purposes, people don’t consider a cofounder as someone who finances a company a year after it’s founded.

[-] yawn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Ok but the Wikipedia for Tesla's history says that musk specifically did not take a role in company operations, he was just hypercritical of design.

So technically he shouldn't be a co founder, he didn't fill that role.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, technically, he shouldn't be listed as COO, which he is not.

I'd recommend looking into the responsibilities of various senior leadership (SVP to C-suite). A CEO, for instance, is largely responsible for fundraising, strategic acquisition planning, and board/investor relations instead of operations (which is a COO's position).

[-] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Yes an investor. Yet, Elon became the largest shareholder when he did invest and actively helped in development/decision-making of the first car. Take off your shit tinted glasses for a second and be rational.

He became chairman in 2004 are you saying that's after Tesla was widely successful? When he won the Global Green for the roadster are you saying some random investor would get that?

[-] dmonzel@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Boots are for feet, not for licking.

[-] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry I'm a rational person who doesn't feel the need to constantly mention the person I dislike.

[-] dmonzel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You're obviously not rational because your entire comment was perpetuating lies in order to defend a billionaire.

[-] indepndnt@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[-] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

How so? Was it producing the first mainstream electric car? Was it because that car traveled 200+mi? Was it because they created one of the quickest cars in the world? Was it because they made a massive charging network?

Do help me.

[-] Th0rgue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you for this post. Musk might be a piece of shit but you don't build/grow several game changing companies by 'just funding' while being incompetent.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
1183 points (100.0% liked)

Antiwork

3651 readers
71 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS