124
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37713 readers
469 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'll disagree.
Adobe products only "seem" like they're full of bloat, but they're actually not: what they have, and makes them competitive, is tools for niche cases. These tools are useless for 99% of the users, even for those where an Adobe product does have a tool for their particular niche case... but otherwise, it wouldn't be there.
When free alternatives have 99% of the most commonly used tools, the only remaining way to compete is to gather the remaining 1% and mash them together... along with the 99% of tools that are now a "have them or die".
Whether you want to pay Adobe's prices just to get the few tools that fit your niche... well, sometimes you have no alternative, or the alternative is even more niche and way more expensive.
Can agree. There are so many features it is mind bogging especially to people who don't have to use it. Very niche uses done well.