85
submitted 1 day ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 4 points 20 hours ago

Before AI, people had been advocating against the meat industry, and had pushed for reduced water usage in agriculture and homes, which led to stricter rules against lawns in drought-prone areas. It being drowned out by the advocacy against AI doesn't mean those voices disappeared, just that there are louder voices now.

I do enjoy the classic "they're doing bad so I can too" fallacy, though.

[-] Mordikan@kbin.earth 1 points 13 hours ago

"they're doing bad so I can too"

I don't think you understand that the "so I can" part implies you. By virtue of even posting, YOU are pushing datacenter demand. These comments don't just live in the ether. The whole point is you are cherry picking what you are upset about based on what is trending (as you even mentioned). The point being you are MORE upset about the lesser evil, not that one is justified evil and the other isn't.

If you enjoy the Two Wrongs Make Right fallacy, then I think you'll love the Special Pleading fallacy.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 11 hours ago

By virtue of even posting, YOU are pushing datacenter demand. These comments don't just live in the ether.

I write software for a living. There's an enormous difference between a text-based service that functionally runs as a primitive CRUD and a compute-heavy service like LLM inferencing. The latter runs on servers that individually consume multiple kilowatts while the former can run on a raspberry pi but gains efficiency by sharing a server that consumes maybe 1kW with dozens of other people. Heck, Lemmy doesn't even need to do video transcoding like all the toxic social media sites do.

The point being you are MORE upset about the lesser evil, not that one is justified evil and the other isn't.

No, people are upset about all the evils. Being more or less upset about one or the other is irrelevant. You're just choosing to cherry pick one thing that everyone who's upset should ignore.

[-] Mordikan@kbin.earth 1 points 7 hours ago

Can run on a raspberry pi and does run on a raspberry pi are two different things. I don't think raspberry pis are the solution here. I'm not cherry picking either as both are clear evils. That is the point. Current non-AI datacenters are using more power in total than AI datacenters. That may (and likely will) change, but the argument that AI datacenters are destroying the environment when the other is destroying it even more (but let's ignore that one) is moronic by nature.

That by definition isn't cherry picking. It's pointing out the logical fallacy in popular thought.

I work in devops. These two things are more alike then you think.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Current non-AI datacenters run all of every other service on the internet.

Current AI datacenters run one class of services.

This is like comparing totals vs per capita.

[-] Mordikan@kbin.earth 1 points 2 hours ago

Ok, so despite everything you said, it is NOT the environmental impact that matters. What matters (at least now) is the number of services it provides. I hate to say it but "You're just choosing to cherry pick one thing that everyone who's upset should ignore."

This is gonna sound like a broken record here but... https://kbin.earth/m/gaming@beehaw.org/t/3103626/ChatGPT-LLMs-and-Automating-the-Fun-Out-of-Roleplaying-Don-t/comment/14132956#entry-comment-14132956

Let's be real here: If subject A destroys the environment and subject B destroys the environment to the same degree, why is the quality/quantity of service provided by either the deciding factor to you when you yourself have stated this is a matter of environmental concern? The outcome being the exact same, the path you take to it is irrelevant. That is the most illogical reason to be ok with anything. And this isn't me putting words in your mouth, this is literally what you have stated in your comment history.

[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 19 hours ago

I'm confused, it seems we agree with eachother - did you mean to reply to the person I replied to, or were you just adding on to my point? :D

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 11 hours ago

Just adding to your comment lol.

[-] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I'm hesitant to jump in here, seeing how far off the rails this went, but AI Data Centers have a plethora of problems. Potable water depletion (The Dalles, OR, USA), Exhaust (Boxtown near Memphis, TN, USA), Noise and lowering water tables (Sydney, Australia). The issues they present over "old school" data centers are amplified because of the speed they arise in communities, resources they use, and power (as in influence) disparities that are part of the package.

They are being built rapidly, with little oversight or research, and suck up enormous resources that "old school" data centers did not. Toss in the ethical concerns as wide ranging as stealing art styles to destroying books; to be normative, that tends to piss people off.

To get us back on rails, all of that contributes to me using theater of the mind rather than Gemini to draw me a portrait for goblin Yipyip in my campaigns.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

35151 readers
83 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS