31
submitted 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) by nerdhd@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Like, it's such a punch in the face of the user when it's hidden in the terms of service. It's so scummy it hurts. I still can't believe corporations are getting away with avoiding going through the legal system like that.

Here are the cons of an arbitration clause:

  1. You lose the right to class action lawsuits
  2. It's less public than going through the legal system
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That's the crux of it. How are arbiters ever going to be truly independent when repeat businesses necessarily only ever comes from one half of their arbitration? CorpoCorpInc selects your arbitration company for 200 arbitrations a year. How many of those cases does CorpoCorpInc lose before they decide to go with a different arbitrator?

So maybe if you want to make a law, find a way to break that implicit feedback loop.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

55242 readers
249 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS