31
submitted 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) by nerdhd@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Like, it's such a punch in the face of the user when it's hidden in the terms of service. It's so scummy it hurts. I still can't believe corporations are getting away with avoiding going through the legal system like that.

Here are the cons of an arbitration clause:

  1. You lose the right to class action lawsuits
  2. It's less public than going through the legal system
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Let's say you're some slob disputing a $65 charge or some shit and they are a multi-billion dollar corporation that does thousands of these a year. Even if you object to their pick, whomever you mutually decide to go with has a chance at repeat businesses with CorpoCorpInc, but very unlikely to have repeat business with you.

Edit: I honestly don´t know anything about the details of arbitration, so if you'd like to tell me what safeguards are in place, I'm all ears.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

55242 readers
249 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS