878
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] The_v@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Most elected positions don't pay enough in the U.S. today. This is expecially true in state legislature where most politicians start before attempting a national run. The only people who can afford to run for underpaid positions are either independently wealthy or corrupt. For example let's look at some of the most corrupt states in the U.S.

Texas - state senators & representatives $7,200 salary and $221/per diem when in session.

Louisiana- senator and representatives $16,800 + $178/per diem and $6000 slush fund.

Utah - state senators and representatives $0 salary and $301/per diem.

Nevada - State senators and representatives $0 salary and $130/per diem.

This lack of pay for positions is deliberate to keep "working class" out of government. It lead to open corruption and conflict of interest being normalized.

[-] Eldritch@piefed.world 13 points 1 day ago

Initially politician wasn't supposed to be a career. It was a side hustle you did after planting and after harvest. Which exains some of the session schedules you see today that seem odd.

I'd argue that we need to get these offices back to being what you do outside your day job again. Whatever that means in modern society. However, if were going to make the mistake of letting it remain a career path. We do need to pay accordingly. While codifying actual laws against graft. Not just unenforceable "norms".

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It was designed so that wealthy landowners could attend sessions more easily. Just like the u.s. senate does not represent the population, but the land area. The writers of the national and state constitutions were almost all wealthy landowners.

In my opinion, given the size of the population and the complexity of the economy, full time politicians who are paid very well combined with draconian anti-graft laws are needed.

[-] NathanDerWeise@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

Most Americans get two weeks off a year, if they're lucky. There's no way to make this "outside your day job."

[-] Eldritch@piefed.world 7 points 1 day ago

They're 100% is. But it 100% requires addressing what you just talked about. There needs to be a new labor movement. Where terms are renegotiated again.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Did you mean after your slaves plantate and harvest?

[-] chisel@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

And then they like to put up measures to increase their salary from $5k to $25k, as if that'll let your average Joe run and isn't just a handout to the already wealthy scum currently in office. Bonus points when they also try to increase the term limit at the same time.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
878 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

17209 readers
1634 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS