713
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HappyCatLuvs_U@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

I love the message and didn't catch it on first read but on seeing it again:

"They didn't get 351x smarter or work 351x harder."

Assuming the baseline was 30x, which is still wild, 30x to 351x would only be a 10-fold increase. So the line should be "They didn't get 10x smarter or work 10x harder" no?

[-] Aedis@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

OK, but hear me out. What if they got 3x smarter and worked ~3.666x harder? Seems plausible right?

3x~3.666≈11x

Still doubtful they ever did even that, but it sounds more plausible.

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Considering most of the bosses and bosses bosses etc I've worked for in my life are the laziest dumb fucks I've ever met ... I have my doubts. There were definitely exceptions but not the majority.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
713 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

17031 readers
1946 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS