356

I've been revisiting anno 2205, infamously the ugly duckling of the Anno series of RTS games. I don't mind so much the fact that it's different, lacks customisation and random map generation - I'm bothered because the game is so slow to progress through on challenge settings, and it feels like a game designed just to artificially waste your time; in other anno games, you can always pull tricks to dig yourself out of economic crisis - selling off assets and surplus goods, completing quests for other parties, or taking loans. 2205 is very very confined in terms of what you can do to financially recover in the early game and forces you into a lot of military events.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago

Similar experience here. You missed the biggest turd though, flying!

So cool eh, no more need to walk eh!

What happened was that instead of roaming about with everyone else, you flew everywhere all alone (just point the "fly" in the right direction and wait ... Soo funny).

And to alleviate this they tried to make it so you "had" to walk everywhere first, before getting your "fly", but that just made it worse because now you'd be as slow as before but also alone, everyone else were flying.

Then it became a sort of dungeon-run slot machine, argh.

Vanilla was truly amazing though, what a game...

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 17 hours ago

It's one of those great ironies, because flight was a requested feature since the beginning and being locked into fixed flight paths left people wanting free flight even more. Back in 2006-7, I don't think most people, or even Blizzard, could predict how much it'd hurt the social aspect of the game.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 13 hours ago

That was an integral part of the game design.

Those things, like underpowered weapons for example, is something "gamers" pester about and want changed, but any good gamedesigner knows better than to listen to them, it breaks the gameplay.

Today it's worse in many games because the "annoying" things still exist but you have to pay to get around them, and it just makes the gameplay suck. IMO.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
356 points (100.0% liked)

Games

25631 readers
694 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS