24
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by No_Pomegranate7135@feddit.online to c/movies@piefed.social

There's a perception that "low budget" movies are crap but that can be a hit or miss depending if the director really managed to pull off a good movie despite insufficient funding and resource allocation. I remember watching "Ghost" (1990) starring Patrick Swayze, Demi Moore & Whoopi Goldberg: the movie was made with a low budget and parts were filmed on location (in NYC). Earning $505,000,000 worldwide despite being made with a $23,000,000 budget.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] popcar2@piefed.ca 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

despite being made with a $23,000,000 budget.

I wouldn't call $23M low budget lol, especially in the '90s.

In terms of low budget, I saw Obsession recently and it's a really good example. It was shot for only $750k, and it made back over $450M.

I also want to give a shoutout to Upgrade (2018), made with a budget of 3 million but is a pretty well done sci-fi considering how limited it was.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
24 points (100.0% liked)

movies

3732 readers
296 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS