332
submitted 3 weeks ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/funny@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

I'm wondering how that 1% remained operating?

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 17 points 3 weeks ago
[-] apftwb@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

138 MW generated from moonlight is insane to me.

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

I’m investing in lunar power now

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Best guess, sunset is being defined as a specific time. Sunset isn't necessarily the point at which all sunlight is gone, and even then, the time the sun goes down varies depending on where you are within a given time zone. If they just used an arbitrary time or an almanac listing for twilight for each day, they could easily end up including slivers of daylight in their post sunset data.

Which is really pointless since this is just the same old "BuT sOlAr DoEsN't WoRk At NiGhT" argument that idiots have been making for decades. But I suppose you gotta at least pretend to use real world data to make it look sciencey.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Had to rely on Google AI for this (downvote all you want but good luck trying to find this without it), but it says dusk/dawn can produce 0.1% to 0.01% capacity. But inverters for DC to AC have a minimum threshold so it's nothing. So not that.

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Firstly: I'm not the downvoter.

Secondly: you didn't have to - you chose to.

And as most chatbots list sources, you can always check them out yourself and cut out the middleman. Most of academia - some 45% do that. Another 45% don't even bother. A lone 10% still do things the old fashioned way. In any case, you're not alone in relying on AI to find obscure information.

With search engines becoming increasingly infested with low-quality and obvious-slop sites, relying on the same methods as the slopmasters isn't even a big stain on your morality. Because of it was, the slopmasters would be drowning in the ink required, and billionaires would already have caused another biblical flood of it.

[-] Entertainmeonly 13 points 3 weeks ago

Did you know that 87% of all statistics are made up on the spot?

[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

60% of the time it works every time

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

49% of us think we're not divided.

[-] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

Half the population can't read statistics and the other third choose not to.

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Academia calls these heuristics, not statistics.

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

Thank God we had you here to tell us what the slop machine sharted out.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

It was sarcasm. Next time keep that shit to yourself.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It was?!?!? Rudeness from ml?!? Well I never!

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

AI slop garbage defenders from .world!? Who'da thunk it?

[-] bonesawmcl@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Could be residual energy generation from the few operating concentrated solar power stations (generating great by reflecting sunlight and that heat persists for a time)

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
332 points (100.0% liked)

Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more

3343 readers
22 users here now

#funny

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS