26

I'm not quite sure where else to post this, but hopefully it'll encourage some fun conversation in any case!

So I saw Killers of the Flower Moon is on offer on Kobo. And just out of interest I scrolled down to the review section, to be met with some very confusing posts.

The Bloom review almost sounds like a response to something. It sounds like some kind of treasure hunt? What's going on with all that weird code?

The Sorry review has a similar feel to it, with the l33t speak stuff going on. I feel like I've wandered in to some kind of alternate reality game from the early 2000s. Or something from Hypnospace Outlaw.

Can anyone enlighten me as to what the hell is going on here?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 days ago

The site seemed to fix itself.

Seems some kids are using the reviews as a chat platform and the "Was this helpful to you?" feature as a sort of upvote system. Clever and funny xD

The "glitches" they're talking about are probably just using html for fancy styling ("Can any please teach me glowing text?") or maybe even display images ("Picture Glitch") if the site/app isn't escaping user input properly. Makes me a little worried about the security of the website tho... I wouldn't put my personal details into there.

But really, there are way worse things kids could be doing on the internet than exploiting a bookstore website/app to chat with friends. Some might find an interesting book every once in a while or maybe even get interested in how to make actual websites with their "glitches"

[-] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Found my kid had been doing this with Spotify playlists to chat with other people in a similar way to get around some site blocks on our network. Seems like the same kind of "find workarounds to every form of adult control" we all did as kids.

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago

Hahah I actually have respect for what they're doing here, using a platform in a creative way for which it was never intended. I could see myself doing the same as a kid.

In some respects, the way it skews book reviews is bit annoying but then again I don't think many people really use the Kobo review section.

(Oh and I decided to purchase Killers of the Flower Moon. It seems interesting!)

[-] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, me too. It would have been the coolest thing ever as a kid to have some "secret" chat room with code names and all that.

Kinda disappointed tho that there wasn't some grand ARG or internet mystery to discover xD

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

It kinda brings me back to the forums and chatrooms I used to visit when I was younger; small populations of users that you'd get to know (not like reddit etc where everything feels very anonymous). Having this little hidden space that feels like your own.

Good job sleuthing!

[-] Ontimp@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Seems charming, but it's just a little too recent and consistent in its weirdness for my taste. I would still put money on these being AI agents.

[-] LeapSecond@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

If you look up some of the names with "" you can find other reviews too. Here's another one where one is showing the "glowing" glitch I guess. Maybe it only works on a kobo. https://www.kobo.com/gb/en/ebook/the-ghost-in-the-glitch-volume1

[-] Pandantic@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

Aww, they're learning HTML to do things like I did back on Myspace! I love it!

[-] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

Ah, the classic old marquee element. That takes me back to the old internet. I wonder if any of them figured out <blink> yet.

And yeah, the website seems to escape everything properly but maybe in the app or in the eReader device it doesn't and the HTML renders.

[-] LeapSecond@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Blinking text is a thing?? I'm kinda sad I never got to use Netscape now

[-] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

Well, actually I don't think the <blink> tag works in any modern browser anymore. Just like <marquee>, it was never part of any standard, it was overused back in the day to the point where it became super annoying, not to mention the accessibility nightmare it was. So no, blinking text on websites is not something we should bring back.

And regardless, nowadays HTML should only be used to describe the structure of a page, not how it looks or behaves, and that's why many of the old tags are deprecated and support slowly dropped. Nowadays different "languages" are used to set how the page should look and operate. Using those it's ofc possible to make text (or any element on the page) blink, there just isn't a single HTML tag for it anymore.

[-] LeapSecond@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Of course you wouldn't want it for anything serious. But going through random old internet pages with text moving all over the place must have been pretty fun at times.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
26 points (100.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

4050 readers
48 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including all information that can initiate conversations when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (e.g. politics or societal debates).
  4. Stay calm: Don’t post angry or to vent or complain. We are a place where everyone can forget about their everyday or not so everyday worries for a moment. Venting, complaining, or posting from a place of anger or resentment doesn't fit the atmosphere we try to foster at all. Feel free to post those on !goodoffmychest@lemmy.world
  5. Keep it clean and SFW
  6. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
  7. No support questions. See !techsupport@lemmy.world

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS