[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 2 points 10 hours ago

It kinda brings me back to the forums and chatrooms I used to visit when I was younger; small populations of users that you'd get to know (not like reddit etc where everything feels very anonymous). Having this little hidden space that feels like your own.

Good job sleuthing!

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 6 points 11 hours ago

Hahah I actually have respect for what they're doing here, using a platform in a creative way for which it was never intended. I could see myself doing the same as a kid.

In some respects, the way it skews book reviews is bit annoying but then again I don't think many people really use the Kobo review section.

(Oh and I decided to purchase Killers of the Flower Moon. It seems interesting!)

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 3 points 11 hours ago

Oh damn, good work! I completely missed what the post was trying to say (I thought the « marks were just some HTML issue).

How bizarre. Yeah it's like some kind of treasure hunt

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 4 points 12 hours ago

I think you might be right. It looks like if you post a review on a Kobo device, you can use bold/italic or whatever and it displays correctly - but when that review then gets posted on the website, it's in plaintext and shows the HTML tags. That could explain some of the weird characters. And for whatever reason, a group of random people (probably kids?) are using Kobo reviews like social media, including cryptic hints as to where they're going to post next.

Why they'd post it to a book like this one though, I have no idea!

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 2 points 13 hours ago

This one https://www.kobo.com/gb/en/ebook/killers-of-the-flower-moon

(maybe because I'm on the UK version of the site)

25

I'm not quite sure where else to post this, but hopefully it'll encourage some fun conversation in any case!

So I saw Killers of the Flower Moon is on offer on Kobo. And just out of interest I scrolled down to the review section, to be met with some very confusing posts.

The Bloom review almost sounds like a response to something. It sounds like some kind of treasure hunt? What's going on with all that weird code?

The Sorry review has a similar feel to it, with the l33t speak stuff going on. I feel like I've wandered in to some kind of alternate reality game from the early 2000s. Or something from Hypnospace Outlaw.

Can anyone enlighten me as to what the hell is going on here?

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

I'm not a mod, but personally I don't see any problem with that :3 It sounds like you're a furry in any case?

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

Blue Prince perhaps? I haven't played Silksong yet so I can't fairly judge it at the moment, but Hollow Knight was such an incredible experience to me that I imagine I'd rate the sequel highly too.

But yes I agree, it very much depends on which games came out that year.

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 5 points 4 days ago

Absolutely, it's great to see smaller studios trying something new with a traditional format; an F-you to the AAA studios that have grown lazy. And I hope it kickstarts more innovation in similar games going forward.

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 4 points 4 days ago

Would you be able to give some examples of what you mean?

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Why? I think the game is overrated and I've quite clearly listed my reasoning. When I suggest that perhaps the game 'is not for me', it's not because I don't enjoy the genre in the first place etc. The exact opposite in fact - on paper, this game is everything I'd want out of an RPG. When I say it's not for me, I mean that perhaps I have some personal gripes that others could overlook; that's my suggestion for why the game is constantly rated so highly despite my feeling that it shouldn't be.

If the game sounded like it would hold no interest for me, I simply wouldn't have played it. I wouldn't play a football game (which I know I wouldn't enjoy) and say it's overrated simply because it's not a genre I like.

Expedition 33 DOES do a lot of things I like, and it kept me more-or-less interested throughout. I just don't think it deserves perfect reviews.

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 7 points 4 days ago

I actually played this just after finishing BG3, which I thought was an incredible game and perhaps one of the best I've ever played.

Perhaps it's just that no RPG is going to quite live up to that experience, so E33 in comparison I couldn't help but criticize a little harshly in my mind.

But even now, BG3 feels like a 10/10 game to me, whereas E33 is perhaps a 8 at best.

[-] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 5 points 4 days ago

That's totally fair! This is just my personal opinion, I'm glad you enjoyed it :)

119
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by OmegaMouse@pawb.social to c/patientgamers@sh.itjust.works

Don't get me wrong, it's still a good game. But I'm not sure it deserves all the hype it got last year.

It does some very clever stuff in terms of gameplay, with each character having their own unique battle system that synergise with the others.

And yes, the soundtrack is incredible.

In terms of the story, whilst it was interesting, the way the game drip-feeds you knowledge in the first two acts quickly became frustrating. There were multiple cutscenes where characters speak in such a vague, superficially poetic way. In reality it just felt pretentious.

Major story spoilers:

spoilerThe overall metaphor for grief is unique. I liked the concept of the characters being creations in this painting, and how that layer of reality feeds into the one you begin the game in. But it felt like everything was revealed all at once in Act 3. The game gives you very little up to that point, so it's hard to emphasize with many of the characters. Perhaps replaying the game knowing what you know changes the perspective of it, but for a new player I'm not sure it's the best way to tell a story.

Perhaps this is an unpopular opinion but I found the game aesthetically quite ugly. Many landscapes had a feeling of copy pasted Unreal assets that looked so same-y at points they became confusing to navigate (especially given the lack of a mini-map). The characters had these blank, uncanny stares half the time and the designs for some of them (Esquie in particular) just didn't look good to me.

Oh and I'm really not sure why the devs decided to add entirely unnecessary platforming elements!

I found certain enemy attacks to be inconsistent and not well telegraphed, leading to some frustrating encounters were you had to memorise the parry timings rather than learn them from a valid cue.

I think the game deserves good reviews, but I'm not quite sure how it won so many GOTY awards. Perhaps it just wasn't the game for me.

12
16

I spent the last few months working on a fursuit head for my sona :3

For a first go, I think he came out pretty good! But I have a list of things to improve for next time.

I might have a go making a friend's head soon (they're a cat)! Although maybe some paws and a tail would be nice to have along with my own head first.

13
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by OmegaMouse@pawb.social to c/giftofgaming@lemmy.world

I've got Steam keys for the following:

Paradise Killer

Blair Witch

Please comment on which you'd like and I'll choose at random by next Monday.

For fun: what's your favourite pokemon?

10
11
All holos?! (pawb.social)

Is this more common with the latest pack?

13
184

Not sure how long it had been there! It had no smell 🤔

5
8
56

I can think of one - auld lang syne. Are there any others? Why not? If anything, New Year's is celebrated by everyone whereas Christmas isn't.

view more: next ›

OmegaMouse

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF