127
Kernel Anti-Cheat Is an Overreach
(nooneshappy.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
127 points (100.0% liked)
Games
25530 readers
119 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I would generally disagree. It happens, but it's still pretty uncommon. Kernel level anti-cheat doesn't stop cheating, but it is invasive and a massive privacy/security risk. Maybe particular titles have higher rates of cheating, like cod or battlefield, which I don't play, but I've yet to run into any obvious cheating in Deadlock, SF6 or Guilty Gear Strive. I put a couple hundred hours into dota 2 without meeting a single obvious cheater. Team Fortress 2 had a botting problem for a long time that was pretty much resolved without the introduction of kernel level anti-cheat.