1717
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mrmisses@lemmy.world 137 points 3 weeks ago

Or he's getting none because he's dead

[-] Steve@communick.news 76 points 3 weeks ago

He's not dead.
Comatose, non-responsive, vegetable? Probably.
But the hospotal isn't going to keep a rotting corpse for a month.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago

Disagree. They made a corpse deliver a baby against the family’s wishes. The people in charge are pure evil

[-] Steve@communick.news 11 points 3 weeks ago

That's not physically possable.
I think you have a different idea what corpse is.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[-] Steve@communick.news 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Good, bad, fascist, whatever, doesn't matter, to a disagreement on nomenclature. A biologically functioning body with a working ATP cycle, isn't a corpse. Ethics and morality are irrelevant.

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

brain dead is considered dead.

no matter if cells still have atp.

it's a corpse.

there's no biological definition for human death. besides a vague "is it curable"

death used to be cardiac death, but we figured out how to save people who had cardiac death, so we move the goalpost to brain death.

[-] Steve@communick.news 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If brain dead is dead bacteria are dead.

A brain dead body isn't a person, but that doesn't make it a corpse. All the biological functions continue. The ATP cycle continues. The body takes in nutrients and uses them to maintain their normal biological functions. Corpses don't do that.

that isn't biology, it's philosophy.

we don't have a good definition of What's alive either

[-] Steve@communick.news 8 points 3 weeks ago

Actually we do have a pretty solid biological definition for life.

That which takes in nutrients, processes them to support itself, and expells waste products. Anything that dose those things is life. That's why viruses aren't considered alive. They don't do those things.

The person part you're right, is more philosophical. I only mention it because it seems to better fit what people are calling "dead" in this case.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Err0r_@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

It's literally not a corpse, it's a brain-dead person / body.

You started this debate with Steve by using sensationalizing language, and I'm here to provide definitions and lay this discussion to rest:

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/brain-dead?q=Braindead

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/corpse?q=Corpse

We can all agree that what they've done is horrible, there's no need to distort language to make a point.

A corpse can not carry a pregnancy, a brain-dead body apparently can if assisted.

I'll see myself out.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

"Is brain death death" and "is a brain-dead person a corpse" are two different questions. The answer to the first is yes, the second is no. You can be dead, but until your body starts decomposing it's not a corpse.

[-] troglodytis@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's simply not correct. A corpse would have more rights to autonomy. You can't force a corpse to donate life saving organs, but you can make a woman.

[-] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

How does this have upvotes? Calling someone fascist for thinking a living body isn’t a corpse? Man this place is such a shit hole sometimes.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

I understand the fascist comment earlier, this time not sure how you define it?

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Steve@communick.news 10 points 3 weeks ago

If brain death is dead, single cell organisms are dead.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

We’re not single called organisms

[-] Steve@communick.news 8 points 3 weeks ago

Of course not. But the definition of death you gave, doesn't distinguish between forms of life.

[-] stephan262@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

The conversation is about human death. The question is at what point is a human being considered dead. If cellular function is brought into it, then a rotting corpse is teeming with bacterial life.

You are right that biological functions of the human body can continue well past the point that someone would be broadly considered dead. I just think that a lack of brain function is a good classification of when to consider that someone has died.

[-] Steve@communick.news 2 points 3 weeks ago

The conversation is about what makes a "corpse".
If the brain dead body still performs the majority of its biological functions, that's not really a corpse.

[-] Magnum@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah the current definition pretty much says a lot of dead stuff together is making one living being

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They will if they're getting leaned on politically, but you are right in that he's not sitting in a bed, they'll just shove him into the morge if they have one.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

Every hospital has a morgue. They deal with too many dead people daily, they aren't going to be moving them out every time someone dies.

Besides, they won't leave bodies sitting in beds they could use for living, paying, patients.

[-] bloogoose@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah and the sitting president wouldn't possibly fuck a child...

[-] Steve@communick.news 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Those realy are the same thing. You're right 🙄

[-] bloogoose@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

Hey, whatever you need to tell yourself to make your perception of reality make sense to you...

[-] decolo@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

They aren't going to let him rot. That isn't connected to the possibility of him ever regaining consciousness whether a replacement is called for.

I don't think anyone here thinks he's literally just sitting out on a hospital bed flat lined.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't think anyone here thinks he's literally just sitting out on a hospital bed flat lined.

No, but there's a decent chance he might be laying in a morgue fridge in the hospital basement.

[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

They could lie about him being there

[-] Steve@communick.news 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's certainly true

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RestlessNotions@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, isn't there some law about social security and brain death...

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
1717 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

17031 readers
1586 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS