394
Weird flex (lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mcqtom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Dude's got a point though. Y'all do make a super big deal about grown-ass adults playing a children's game.

[-] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 week ago

You sure you have an issue with adults playing childrens games?

[-] mcqtom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Would you like to make a big deal out of me playing children's games? Perhaps you'd like to place a bet on the Maximals winning this week. Lord help you if you're wrong and have to show your face at work tomorrow. Don't forget to wear your Maximals t-shirt while my play session is televised. I've sunk billions of dollars into my toys. I only hire the most competent friends to come over and play with me. I apologize if I make a mistake and ruin your entire day.

[-] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

I have no problem with adults playing with toys or kids games. In my opinion do what makes you happy and be happy as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.

I'm just pointing out that you are an unserious hypocrite.

No idea what a maximal is and frankly don't care.

[-] mcqtom@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Cutting all the snarkiness: I also have zero issue with adults playing kids games. My point was about the insane proportions to which professional sports are blown.

I also want to add that when you disagree with someone, going into their post history to find some personal attack to make against them is both lousy strategy and douchey. Even if I am a hypocrite, your goal should be to attack my opinion, not me.

And yes, I am also a douche for criticizing how people spend their spare time.

[-] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Using someone's past to show they’re a hypocrite isn't wrong—it's just called accountability, which clearly you aren't used to. It’s kinda hilarious you actually typed that out, looked at it, and still hit send. 🤣 At least we can agree on one thing: you are definitely a douche.

Roll out now Hypocriticus Prime, you ain't worth typing any further 🫳🎤

[-] chloroken@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

It is neither lousy nor douchey to use someone's public words against them.

[-] mcqtom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Right. But if you use someone's public words against them to try to win an argument, they should be somehow related to the subject at hand.

I know y'all think I said adults shouldn't play children's games, but I super, duper did not.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

As much of a point as the US president ordering FIFA to overturn a red card?

[-] Alabaster_Mango@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~With how popular US high school sports are (literally kids playing games), I don't think that's as good of an argument as you think it is.~~

I've got the reading comprehension of a twelve year old, lol. I think that was the point you were making too.....

Uhh, adults playing sports in the US are pretty popular too! (totally saved it)

[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Before world cup:

"We don't even care about soccer"

During:

"USA is the best soccer playing nation. Look at how scared everyone is. LMAO"

After losing despite cheating:

"We don't even care about soccer and look at our orphan crushing machine, do you even have one?"

What sore loser mentality.

[-] Blubber28@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I think you misinterpret the tweet then. Such childish behaviour as "We hAvE aIrCraft CarrIEr nUhUh" doesn't exactly say "we don't care." It just screams "I am a sore loser." I absolutely agree with the rest of your statement, though. It is wild to me how many people care about a bunch of millionaires running after a ball. Or running circles. Or driving cars. Or hitting balls across a net. Or throwing a ball. Etc. It is absolutely fine to enjoy doing those things, but the whole show and dance around it is just ridiculous.

[-] mcqtom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I take it back. I did misinterpret the tweet a little bit. Dude CLEARLY makes a big deal out of grown-ups playing children's games.

[-] Blubber28@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No problem fam, we all mess up from time to time!

[-] mcqtom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I interpreted it just fine. And you interpreted me just fine. Apparently a rare skill indeed.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What even is a children's game? A game that can be played by children? That's almost every game, even games with pointy or heavy things have child-safe versions

[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Its just a cultural thing. In the US, children play just about every sport, but once kids get to high school, soccer falls off the map and everyone migrates over to American football and basketball. I think they just mean that generally speaking only children play soccer in the US. It's of course not true, there are high school teams and lots of tech leagues, but it is true that hardly anyone who is not a child plays in the US.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Oooooh, it's an american chauvinism thing

[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

No, it's an, Americans don't like soccer all that much thing.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I don't like cricket either, but you won't catch me getting all of India upset by shitting on it.

[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

I really have no idea who Ed K is in the post but he doesn't speak for all americans, and he is probably MAG so he probably shits on everything.

For the record I think it's fun to play. I dont particularly like watching it but then again I find watching most sports boring.

[-] prole 5 points 1 week ago

It's only a children's game in the US.

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

I think its that all sports are ultimately inconsequential entertainment people get way too serious about.

Unlike war profiteering, which is a very important contribution.

People should be proud of how many children the can kill directly and indirectly through military action, proxy wars, and allocation of lifesaving funds to the military industrial complex.

[-] prole 1 points 1 week ago

Wow, talk about non sequitur. Yes, war profiteering is far more consequential than sports. No shit.

They're not children's games, because we have entire professional leagues of adults being paid to play.

I'm not even a sports fan, I just don't purposely avoid trying to understand things so I can feel superior to people who do.

[-] mcqtom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

All games are children's games. People use "growing up" as a reason to quit when in reality we get too old to play to win.

[-] kek_kecske_31@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Dude would have a point if they would not "counteract" grown-ass adults playing a children's game with an even worse case of it.

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
394 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9344 readers
266 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS