57
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by TRAHR@sh.itjust.works to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alapakala@quokk.au 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

did you 2× check these?

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202205/1266271.shtml

has no evidence, it's all libel

https://truthout.org/articles/nobel-peace-laureates-slam-human-rights-watchs-refusal-to-cut-ties-to-us-government/

Is an OPED, where in group A claims HRW has conflicts of interest. Not that it is true or not, but that Truthout decide to publish this claim.

https://web.archive.org/web/20181105214850/https://www.alternet.org/world/nobel-peace-laureates-human-rights-watch-close-your-revolving-door-us-government?paging=off

This is doing the samething as Truthout, giving these accusation a platform.

[-] kopasu22@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Rules for thee, but not for me.

Maybe if you actually bothered to read the articles I linked, you'd see there are plenty of verifiable sources for the statements they make.

We just blindly trust the accuracy of OP, who didn't even bother to link to an article, yet discredit any suggestion that there might be bias at work in HRW because it's not widely covered by western controlled liberal media.

HRW is just an organization trying to establish casus belli for western imperialism.

https://www.ngo-monitor.org/ngos/human_rights_watch_hrw_/

https://fpif.org/human-rights-watch-close-u-s-government/

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I did read. I also questioned OP.
Maybe try a little less patronization, and more open minded reading.

Thank you for the other sources.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2238 readers
502 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS