Justin Ling: I’ve studied the ‘incel’ culture that fuelled the Montreal shooting and solutions are hard to find (www.thestar.com)

submitted 3 days ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Because as expected, the sources don't support the initial claim...and you know that because you made your claim without any, then scrambled to try and find some that supported your presupposition.

Maybe you're just ignorant and stubborn, maybe you're a bad faith actor intentionally spreading misinformation; that's up for other people to decide.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Your bullshit doesn't just stand uncontested, it's not other people's responsibility to validate your lies.

[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

No, you just don't like the results so you have to attack them. Can you give ONE criticism of china? Or is it a perfect country with no flaws and anybody who disagrees is a paid bot??

These aren't extraordinary claims and you're not even trying to have a convo in good faith. It's funny you call everyone who disagrees with you ignorant and stubborn when you're the one without access to info thanks to the great firewall. But let me guess, that doesn't exist and tienemann square never happened and Taiwan isn't a county and Hong Kong needed to be liberated?

You're bullshit won't go uncontested either, better have someone ban us from this instance too so you can spout your propaganda bull shit in peace.

[-] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I'm Canadian you fuckwit...

Your search term is literal confirmation bias presented by AI...

Did you not learn the scientific method wherever you were educated?

Develop a hypothesis.
Design experiments to disprove your hypothesis.
IF you can't disprove your hypothesis with extensive peer reviewed experimentation, then it might be true.
Rinse and repeat until you have overwhelming evidence disproving any other natural explanation.

The fact that you just played all the anti-China greatest hits demonstrates that you are predisposed to be critical of other cultures and will actively seek out information exclusively to confirm your bias... Grow up.

[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I told you from the start I just Googled the info but you kept demanding sources. And if you're not Chinese it means you could've Googled the exact same thing but you just wanted me to do research for you and waste my time. And another poster gave you THREE linked sources and you just ignored them lmao!

You're a Canadian larping as a CCP propagandist? Weird hobby but sure. Still havent made any criticism of china btw.

[-] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I have read all 3 of those sources AND Googled "what percentage of the population of China has access to safe drinking water" and NONE of the results agree with your claims... That's the point.

You're either lying, or too stupid to use the internet safely.

You're stuck in an echo chamber and you don't even realize it. I'm trying to fucking help you learn how to think for yourself and do REAL research and your only response is ad hominem attacks...

[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

So your saying tapwater in china is safe to drink? That's really what you're trying to argue for this whole time?? Well I guess people believe the earth is flat so you can really believe whatever you want.