348
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
348 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
14903 readers
311 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I think it's pretty obvious some folks get away with a little bit of AI art if they're able to do most of the art themselves to create a cohesive art direction.
But if you have a cohesive art direction, it's pretty much a guarantee you didn't use AI for the art in general. It just isn't able to perform that well yet, and it's clear the non artists who use AI don't have the eye for what makes it so bad.
Maybe a shortcut for a decorative item here and there, but it's almost pointless if you already have the talent to make original assets.
My experience of AI image generation is that there are a lot of controls on style. I don't really see how art direction is more difficult, in the light of that.