163
submitted 1 week ago by when@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Be civil and follow principle of charity in the comments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 94 points 1 week ago

Everybody's gotta eat, but not everyone's gotta fuck a dog

[-] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

No one has to eat meat, in fact with all the space used for animals we could produce way more food instead.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 16 points 1 week ago

No one has to eat meat

People with crohn's or colostomy bags would disagree.

in fact with all the space used for animals we could produce way more food instead.

The space used for animals is grassland and doesn't have the right soil to be cropland. i.e. if all animals disappeared tomorrow we wouldn't get any more cropland at all.

[-] RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

With one exception being the animals that are fed with crops.

We wouldn't grow more crops in total, but more would be available for human consumption.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We wouldn’t grow more crops in total, but more would be available for human consumption.

The bulk of animal food from crops isn't human edible, i.e. the leftover waste. Cows have an amazing ruminant digestive system that can process plant food that humans can't!

Cool idea: don't presuppose what literally every human needs based on your narrow worldview. Without significant animal fat and protein I wouldn't be able live.

No, I'm not going to get into specifics, but also, no, I cannot get my current nutritional needs (and still desire to eat) by cutting animal products and biproducts in my diet.

[-] helix@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Then who has to fuck a dog? Didn't you mean noone has to fuck a dog?

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Paging lemmy.world/u/noone

what do you have to say for yourself?

[-] ImminentOrbit@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I think their point is that there are options to not eat the dog either.

[-] folaht@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Are there more people then having sex with dogs than there are those who eat them?

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
163 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

54702 readers
398 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS