537
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 122 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I voted for him. Fuck the establishment. He refused to play dirty politics and sling mud, even when it was slung his way numerous times. I wish there were more candidates of his integrity.

Everyone has a past, but people can grow up and change. Graham is no different. It's who he is today that matters.

If you truely don't believe people can change, then what's the point of finding Jesus, going to prison or rehab, seeking mental therapy, etc.?

[-] architect@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 day ago

Being forgiven doesn’t mean being chosen to lead the people.

People late to their mcjobs are forgiven less than this.

[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Being forgiven doesn’t mean being chosen to lead the people.

Right. Votes are what counts, and votes are how one is chosen.

People late to their mcjobs are forgiven less than this.

He's not late to a job. He's running for an office, and he's running with a platform that he owns and a background he owns, and he's running against someone else with their own platform and baggage. This "mcjob" has 2 applicants that have passed the HR screening process and stand a chance at securing the open position. Which applicant is best suited to perform acceptably is up to the voter.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

We don’t generally forgive convicts and let them have a new life, that’s why recidivism is so bad. Society is also quietly prejudiced against people with mental health issues, which is why it’s so hard to get treated or get time off for it. “Finding Jesus” is loaded in so many different ways I can’t cover that here.

That said, I’m totally for understanding people can change and am very much against ghost banning people with a history that they have grown out of. People do change, everyone has things they’ve fucked up in the past.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Case in point: Smedley Butler.

He was a retired Marine Corps Major General, started out as a true believer but paid attention to all the shit he was involved in and eventually realized that he was just violently enforcing the wishes of the wealthy true rulers of the American state.

So when some of them approached him to join the Business Plot, where they'd coup the US government in a similar fashion to Mussolini's Italian coup (basically march a bunch of soldiers and supporters in to the captial while the government is unprepared to defend against a mob and demand the government be handed over, though in Italy's case it helped that they had a system where a monarch held power over the rest of the government and ended up getting their way by promising to leave the king alone). Butler instead sat in meetings to gather information and then turned on them, at which point the government had some harsh words for the plotters (that included GW Bush's grandfather) before sending them on their way to think about what they did wrong (and how to do it more effectively the next time).

This guy wasn't just a marine but a leader of marines and though he didn't question his orders (that we know of anyways) in the moment, he did reflect on everything he had seen and done and didn't like it. IMO former believers who turn are even more important as allies than those who were always on the right side because the ones who have been on both sides have more experience and knowledge about the specifics of how the other side operates.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah I'm really hoping Platner is another Smedley, but I'm afraid he might not be. Giving power to someone like this is scary. Hell the only reason Smedley was able to stop the business plot is that the conspirators assumed he hadn't changed.

In the primaries I was tentatively pro Platner. In the general I'm just pro Platner. And if he wins and his actions match his words then in 6 years I'll be extremely pro Platner.

Hell, for all I hate Fetterman I'm still glad he didn't lose the general, Senator Mehmet Oz would've been worse.

[-] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, the old American tradition of letting rich white men get away with literally anything, up to and including High Treason.

[-] prole 11 points 1 day ago

Maybe I'm crazy, but "guys I grew out of the murderous Nazi beliefs" just doesn't cut it for me. Especially for someone running for office.

They might even be telling the truth. Don't care, you were a fucking Nazi so I will never trust you with the levers of power.

[-] btsax@reddthat.com 21 points 1 day ago

If this guy was actually a Nazi he'd be fast-tracked in the Republican party instead of trying to play on hard mode rehabbing his image as a working class Democrat. You don't even have to cover your tattoos up as a Republican, they just let you be secdef

[-] prole 6 points 16 hours ago

Let's assume for the sake of this comment that it is all bullshit and he's actually right wing or whatever... The Republican party would now be in a win/win situation in Maine. No matter what the outcome is, they've won. They don't even need to spend money on that race.

[-] Starik@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

And if my grandma had wheels she’d be a bicycle.

[-] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

Good cop bad cop. I don’t believe they are as stupid as you think.

[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 day ago

It's there any Nazi ideology you can quote? Or are we still talking about a covered up tattoo?

[-] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah it seems like that's all they've got. There are 3-ish of these folks astroturfing up and down the entire thread.

Perhaps they're on someone's payroll, good to see no one's buying it except themselves. They're exceedingly good at wasting everyone's time and energy (including their own) with this weak af reasoning.

[-] prole 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I'm not astroturfing shit, I'm just fucking pissed at all the "I refuse to vote for someone who supports genocide" people bending over backwards to avoid criticizing a man who has a Nazi tattoo and has openly talked about murdering Iraqis.

Apparently all you need to do is just say some socialist shit, and you're golden.

Have some fucking standards.

I hope all of this concern ends up being unwarranted, I really do. And I would hold my nose and vote for him in the general if I were in Maine.

But this "how dare you be at all skeptical of a man with a dark, murderous, past and a Nazi tattoo on his chest" shit is just too much.

Like that's really all it takes? Just pay some lip service to socialism, and you're willing to ignore the biggest red flag for a Democratic Senate candidate I can remember ever seeing?

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

What Nazi beliefs has he espoused so far on the campaign trail?

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

Enjoying killing innocent Iraqis. Next question?

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

“Four tours as an infantryman in the Marines and then Army, did both Iraq and Afghanistan. It's hard to explain how much I enjoyed combat. It is both physically and intellectually challenging, and incredibly exciting (especially the first few times). I was never a huge fan of killing, at least not for killings sake, but I did love winning and that required killing.”

From his 2015 reddit comments.

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

Sounds like he very much enjoyed it, lol.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I think that requires a wilful misinterpretation of what he said to conclude he "very much" enjoyed killing given he expressly says he did not. It's certainly questionable, but it's not as blatantly clear as many people are claiming.

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

Right, he hated doing it so much that he just had to go back 4 times. And then he continued to hate it while he joined Blackwater as a mercenary.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I can't find a single record of him saying he hated it. Many examples of him being disgusted with his past behavior and complacency with imperialism, but in none of them does he say he hated it at the time. Do you have a source where he claims that?

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

I was being sarcastic, lol. He clearly enjoyed it.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

And yet, I wasn't being sarcastic. Do you have anything to back up your claim? Because he has consistently represented himself on this issue, and it fundamentally disagrees with your assertions. I can't find any reason to doubt him or his characterization of himself - which I want to add, is still not exactly great. It's just not cut and dry like you're claiming.

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

I can't help you with your naivety. If someone continues to put themself in a situation where they're killing innocent civilians, says they can't even explain how much they enjoy "combat", and then tells you they don't like it, and you believe them, that's a you problem.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

No, I didn't think you could back your claims up. Thank you for confirming that for me.

[-] prole 5 points 16 hours ago

Politicians never lie, good point. And it's not like we have at least two examples of this exact thing happening before.

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago

Alright well I guess we will see. Also fuck Susan Collins. I’m glad she’s outta there.

[-] prole 2 points 15 hours ago

She's not out of there yet, Platner has only won the Democratic nomination. He still needs to run against her.

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

That's the level of political knowledge these people possess 🤦

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 9 points 1 day ago

Sure people can change, but has he actually shown anyone that he has changed? Time will tell wether he's just another Fetterman or if he has genuinly changed, but I'm not holding my breath.

this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
537 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30038 readers
2046 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS