492
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

if it means having to suffer someone we don’t agree with 95%+

You agree with someone who supports genocide 95%? I sure as hell don't.

Trivializing important issues doesn't make your point.

[-] optimisticturtle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Genocide -- by which I assume you singularly mean Palestine as I doubt you care as much about other ones going on (e.g.in Sudan, Myanmar) -- is not the only issue. (And before you insinuate I don't care about Gaza, I donate to organizations that provide aid there as well as other international crises as the war in the DRC, etc.) There's other important issues like climate change, dismantling the prison industrial complex, restoring reproductive rights, healthcare reform, reigning in the surveillance techbros, etc. I assume you support at least the majority of these. These are all 'important issues' and losing ground on these has the potential to harm millions domestically and abroad.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I asked you a question. It's a yes or no question.

You agree with someone who supports genocide 95%?

You gave that percentage to make your point. Now it's time for you to demonstrate that's what you actually believe.

[-] optimisticturtle@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I don't even agree with Biden or Harris or most AIPAC Dems near that much and certainly not the right. Nice attempted gotcha though.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

If you weren't talking about Biden and Harris then who were you talking about when you said

Meanwhile, we are willing to let it all go to hell if it means having to suffer someone we don’t agree with 95%+

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 21 hours ago

If genocide is on the table, it is literally the only important issue.

[-] optimisticturtle@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

As with the other commenter, I doubt you care about the genocide in Sudan or Myanmar and singularly mean Palestine. After all, we POC here in the States are so clearly expendable to you why would you care about most other POC abroad? With Palestine you get to meme on Israel all day (which is where the caring starts and ends as the online left is so averse to putting in work to effect change but somehow expect to win a revolution someday lol). With Sudan, Myanmar, there's no reward from that as there's no state with near the notoriety of Israel to meme on and it's not like you're going to actually put in work so why bother?

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago

Genocides are bad. Your tax money and weapons of mass destruction are being used to systematically eradicate one particular people. I do care about Sudan and Myanmar, as I said all genocides are bad, the only difference is that YOU are directly responsible for Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran. Does that help clear things up?

[-] optimisticturtle@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Your tax money and weapons of mass destruction are being used to systematically eradicate one particular people.

Multiple bullshit wars and what's going on in Palestine. I hate all of it. I believe in taxes to fund infrastructure, social programs, etc but until the status quo changes of bloat for the former and austerity for the rest, I find reducing my taxable income an ethical thing to do. But I find this an interesting argument to make. If you're a part of the West, unless you don't pay taxes, your money has almost certainly gone to fund some sort of neo-imperialist agenda -- presumably also against your will.

I do care about Sudan and Myanmar, as I said all genocides are bad,

Great, now how are you effecting change on these besides typing words?

at YOU are directly responsible for Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran

I don't own that. IMO getting Kamala in would have been a temporary insult while getting people in Congress who take no AIPAC money and obstruct, obstruct, obstruct. It's a tactic that works. Then next presidential election with time to find non-AIPAC presidential candidates replace her. Apathy let Trump in who was actually the only one stupid enough to go to war in Iran and pour gasoline on the former issues.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
492 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

11925 readers
2582 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS