609
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah shame. Take out all the tech bullshit I dont want and I bet that number gets cut nearly in half. Abs, efi, maybe airbags if you want.

We can make simple vehicles. They just refuse to. Becuase simple won't break and be unrepairable by the end user. Gotta jeep those stealerships in business with proprietary tools.

In short, with late stage capitalism you will never have a good car again.

[-] blitzen@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'm certain airbags are a legal requirement.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh they are. Cameras and screens inside your car are legal requirements too. Shit the government does to state its legal or illegal is often not good.

[-] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I guess what I'm trying to say is there is a difference simplifying in an acceptable manner (perhaps backup cameras don't need to be mandated) and doing so in an unsafe manner; I don't think making seatbelts, airbags, or anti-lock brakes optional in the name of "simplicity" is a good idea.

Depending on how long ago you define as the period we had "good" cars, it might be an order of magnitude less safe. It's hard to separate the unnecessary tech with things that have made cars exponentially safer over the past few decades.

I too wish for vehicles that are more simple, but let's not toss the "safety" baby out with the "upgrades" bathwater.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Agree.

For me, 2004 was peak car. Safe enough , had abs and efi, still somewhat lightweight and easy to work on, etc.

[-] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think depending on the model, peak is somewhere about 2005 (I’d consider your 2004 right in there) to about 2015. The inclusion of CarPlay was a big plus.

My next car will likely be a mid-teens Golf GTI. It may not be the best in any one category (efficiency, practicality, depreciation, safety, fun, repairability, etc) but it scores high in all of them.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Those are good cars!

I have zero interest in screens or media in cars. Usually car stereo systems suck, at least in cars I enjoy driving which are usually sporty (road noise, tire noise etc). I have a listening setup at home for actually enjoying music. If i want a podcast on a long drive, a cheapo stereo is just fine.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately, software defined vehicle is cheaper to build, then you get all the fancy stuff “for free”. One of the many problems legacy manufacturers have is the extra miles of wiring they need to install, mostly manual labor

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, very unfortunate!

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
609 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

85782 readers
3309 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS