254
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
254 points (100.0% liked)
movies
3550 readers
288 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This study does not include the 63 year old Michelle Yeoh in Wicked: For Good, which made $56 million in British box offices in 2025 according to the source the study claims to be using. Compare this to the $6 million made in the UK by Alleluyah, which the study does include.
Trying to find more information about their methodology on their website:
lol
I think the study simply fucked up. I found Yeoh in under five minutes of just checking the UK top 10, who knows how many other actresses Gemini overlooked that the "manual check" didn't catch either.
I haven't watched any of the Wicked. According to imdb Michelle Yeoh is not staring neither in 1 nor in 2. So it looks like the wicked movies don't meet the criteria to make it to the list anyways.
If you open those links and scroll to the ‘Top Cast’ section, Michelle Yeoh is listed fourth on both pages just after Jeff Goldblum. I’ve got no dog in this fight - I’m just someone who’s seen both films - and I’ve gotta say that she did great in both of them.
You are totally right, she appears 4th in both films.
In the same time for Wicked (2024 film) Ariana Grande appears 2nd in imdb and is nominated for Best Supporting Actress, not leading role [wiki list].
For Wicked: for good, it looks like there were no nominations?
And same here, I don't have a dog in this fight, for sure. I just really like looking up stuff.