866
Anon is a gamer (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Signtist@bookwyr.me 11 points 1 day ago

Why rely on someone else's go-ahead if you can just do something different? They didn't patent it for no reason - they want a cut if someone using it makes a bunch of money, and likely won't give you the go-ahead without that guarantee.

[-] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

Ofc, but that is the issue. Make the cut reasonable about some devs will be willing to pay the price.

[-] Signtist@bookwyr.me 1 points 23 hours ago

It'd have to be pretty reasonable. From the perspective of the people who have to pay, it's just as easy to tell the plebs beneath them to come up with something even better that doesn't require a fee. If they fail, it's because they were lazy, not because you're a bad leader, obviously.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
866 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

8252 readers
910 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS