50
submitted 2 days ago by Smackyroon@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

you know oppressed people stop being oppressed because of war right?

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 2 days ago

Or, war itself is a tool of oppression.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

This mf thinks it was oppressive to end slavery in the US

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This ml thinks slavery was ended in the US.

There are more slaves in the US now than there were in 1860. So tell me again, what is war good for?

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

"The civil war was bad because it didn't end all slavery, we should have just let the Confederacy continue"

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

"War is good because it ended slavery once, even though it didn't actually end slavery at all."

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Nobody said war is always good, dumbass

[-] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago

This is just an expansion on "violence is inherently bad" which as an anarchist I hope isn't something you believe

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Violence is inherently harmful.

Some people and institutions do deserve to be harmed. Those people and institutions are almost never who actually gets harmed in war. War sucks.

[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

do you know what's harmful? capitalism. i'd suffer every pain for the world to achieve socialism. yes, you might not believe it, having a comfortable life in the global north, but there are people willing to be harmed to achieve liberation.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago
[-] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago

So would you oppose a war of liberation, such as the Vietnamese fought against Japan, France and America?

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago

No, not really.

But neither of the wars mentioned in this 'infographic' are wars of liberation.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

So you lied when you said war is a tool of oppression and you oppose all war

[-] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago

But neither of the wars mentioned in this ‘infographic’ are wars of liberation.

"The Palestinian struggle against the Israeli settler colonialists is not a war of liberation actually"

You might possibly be the least intelligent person I've ever seen.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

Scratch and a bleeds, as usual

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago

War is defined by the instigator. Israel's attacks are not a war of liberation.

[-] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

War is defined by the instigator

I don't understand what you mean by this. Defined in what way?

[-] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

War is defined by the instigator.

Maybe, if you're a simpleton who needs everything boiled down to a single slogan/view due to being incapable of perceiving and analysing the totality of the event.

The great patriotic war was a war of liberation despite the Nazis instigating.

The war of resistance against Japan was again a war of liberation despite the Japanese instigating.

The Korean war was again a war of liberation despite it being instigated by the US and it's client state.

And so on.

this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
50 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

55839 readers
468 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS