895
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
895 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
65337 readers
360 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
They support and fund DHH
You mean Rails World?
Same guy, but no, I was referring to Omarchy and DHH himself.
The present tense "support" is not true. If unintentional, probably best to edit the reply?
I'd be happy to if I could find any evidence it were true.
That's not how it works, right? You make the accusation; so you provide the evidence.
The claim implied in the present tense is that their relationship with DHH (insofar as there was one) is still ongoing.
I'm not in the habit of assuming companies that knowingly supported bigots, the benefit of the doubt. If there isn't a clear, loud and non ambiguous walking back of their clear, loud and unambiguous support, then why would you, I or anyone else assume they have done so?
Because... of the paper trail? Rails World 2026 sponsorships are up and they are not in; they haven't retweeted Omarchy rices since October; and... I admit, I can't be sure they haven't sent him another computer. Which — as you know — concludes the exhaustive trifecta of clear, loud and unambiguous support for bigots.
But you, I, and everyone else knows it's not about what they do materially. As someone in a related thread actually put in writing, they ought to "denounce, when questioned".
Meh.
I'm not "meh" about denouncing bigots. If you've supported a bigot and you don't actively and vocally walk it back, that's not "meh". That's a refusal to acknowledge the issue and the harm done in normalising the voices and visibility of bigots
If we agree the issue is about denouncing alone, and not any material activity, maybe the intellectually honest thing would be to update
to say what you actually mean — a tech company that refused to take a stance outside of their purview. (As a company). Which, I agree, is not exactly a badge of honour.
(Not to mention they never, once, funded DHH directly. But sure, retweets win at the exchange rate.)
(Oh and please look up Mette Frederiksen at some point.)
I'm not going to dance around words because you want to protect the sensibilities of a bigot.
I want you to stop lying about what Framework did or does, that's all.
They positioned themselves as the ethical choice, financially supported a bigot, and advertised his distro, then made excuses for it when called out.
Kinda like you're doing
Frankly, I can live with that framing.
On both counts, even.
@ada
🤔 Is talking shit about a bigot for their bigoty ways not bigotry itself?
@pseudo