389
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Jankatarch@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The "average" they're finding is an average of the training set. That can't actually apply to public opinion polls because the data in the set is going to be biased towards people that express their opinions. There's already polling bias towards people who are likely to answer polling questions, now imagine that bias being applied to the loudest, most opinionated, most prolific posters.

[-] BluesF@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yes that's definitely also an issue, although as you point out is already an issue with public opinion polling. I'm not sure how you would evaluate how much of a gap there is between the two.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's worse, because pollsters at least go out and solicit opinions from people who might not otherwise express their opinions.

An LLM is collecting opinions from people who happily and freely share their opinions without even being prompted, and completely ignoring people who don't post their opinion. No attempt is made to account for the people who don't post opinions because no one reaches out to them, they're invisible. I don't think there's even a way to account for this, it's just inherently busted.

this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
389 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7050 readers
1656 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS